共查询到18条相似文献,搜索用时 156 毫秒
1.
本文通过梳理我国现存公益性捐赠的基本税收优惠政策、突发事件及特别事项税收优惠政策、新冠肺炎疫情下新出台的公益性捐赠税收优惠政策,发现现有公益性捐赠税收优惠政策体系存在缺乏稳定性和系统性、符合税前扣除资格的公益性组织偏少、限额扣除比例低且超额捐赠结转年限短等问题。有鉴于此,本文结合我国国情提出了完善公益性捐赠法律法规及配套的税收激励政策、建立科学的公益性捐赠税前扣除制度等促进公益性捐赠的建议。 相似文献
2.
我国现行企业所得税对企业公益性捐赠执行税前限额扣除,很大程度上发挥了激励企业公益捐赠的效应。但随着公益事业的发展,对企业公益捐赠的税收优惠力度还需加大。本文建议:调整非货币性捐赠企业所得税应纳税所得额税前扣除计税基数;在企业将货物等用于公益性捐赠时应执行税收优惠政策,免征增值税、消费税、营业税。 相似文献
3.
4.
孙瑜晨 《内蒙古财经学院学报》2014,(6):26-35
企业慈善捐赠能促进社会财富的第三次分配,弥补政府职能的缺位,是企业承担社会责任的主要形式。慈善事业的蓬勃发展,需要完善的捐赠税收优惠制度予以支持和引导。《中共中央关于全面深化改革若干重大问题的决定》提出“完善慈善捐助减免税制度”,应当从捐赠税收优惠制度的形式优化,实行据实扣除和限额扣除相搭配的税前扣除方式,构建非货币性财产捐赠评估规则,扩大捐赠税前扣除资格保有组织数量等方面完善激励性制度安排,同时从企业捐赠税收优惠监督机制的重构方面完善约束性制度安排。 相似文献
5.
6.
7.
本文基于企业慈善捐赠动机以及慈善捐赠企业所得税收优惠激励机理分析,针对企业所得税制度影响我国企业慈善捐赠规模和倾向的问题,提出扩大享受税前扣除的捐赠范围、适当扩展结转年度限制、试行差异扣除比例、扩大享受税前扣除资格的慈善组织范围等促进我国企业慈善捐赠的所得税税收优惠政策。 相似文献
8.
9.
10.
公益性捐赠是一项社会公益行为,是企业的自愿行为。但在企业所得税上,并非因为企业是为了公益事业就一律全额税前扣除。因为企业捐赠的多少直接影响企业所得税的税基,进而影响国家财政收入。所以,不允许公益性捐赠全部税前扣除主要是基于三方面的原因:一是为了保证国家税收收入;二是为了税收征管的需要;三是为了规范捐赠企业和接受捐赠的社会团体的行为。 相似文献
11.
近年来国内外突发公共卫生事件发生频率增加,其对经济造成的负面影响不容小觑。税收政策是国家治理和宏观调控的重要工具,对中国这样一个拥有超大规模市场的巨型经济体,建立和完善应对突发公共卫生事件的税收政策体系,发挥其在疫情防控及经济恢复中的保障作用,不仅很有必要,而且对完善国家治理体系现代化具有深远意义。基于此,本文以新冠肺炎疫情为背景,运用相关理论阐述了税收政策应对突发公共卫生事件的必要性,对现有相关应对疫情的税收政策进行系统梳理,提出完善我国突发公共卫生事件的税收政策建议。 相似文献
12.
社会捐赠税收激励的国际经验与政策建议 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
社会捐赠是在政府和市场发挥作用的基础上对资源进行再分配的一种形式。受经济、历史、文化等诸因素的影响,各国的社会捐赠发展模式不尽相同。其中,美国、日本和荷兰的捐赠模式各具特点且较有代表性,本文比较了上述三国社会捐赠的税收激励政策,总结了其现有的实践经验,在此基础上提出构建我国社会捐赠税收激励体系的政策建议。 相似文献
13.
Sarah Smith 《Fiscal Studies》2012,33(4):449-466
There is growing policy interest in charitable giving in the UK. As part of its Big Society agenda, the current government is keen to encourage a higher level of donations, highlighting new technologies, new social norms and tax incentives as potential mechanisms for raising giving. In the 2012 Budget, however, the Chancellor also proposed limiting tax relief on donations to £50,000, sparking an intense discussion about the effectiveness and desirability of tax incentives for major donors. This paper brings together recent evidence relevant to the ongoing policy debates. 相似文献
14.
15.
张安毅 《上海金融学院学报》2013,(4):99-105
妥当定位公司慈善捐赠中董事的行为规则,是解决公司慈善捐赠活动中各种利益冲突的关键.客观上公司慈善捐赠会增进社会公共利益,但董事决策公司慈善捐赠的行为目标却应该与董事在公司治理中的职责相一致,即促进公司利益最大化.公司慈善捐赠中董事需对公司承担忠实义务和勤勉义务,以公司利益为自己的行为准则,竭力通过捐赠促进公司长期与短期利益的最大化. 相似文献
16.
When socially desirable behaviors are deemed difficult to legislate, tax code is often called upon to indirectly achieve the
desired ends. Adjustments to tax policy have been employed to spark investment, encourage charitable donations, and discourage
tobacco consumption, to name a few examples. This paper demonstrates that tax policy may also be an effective means of encouraging
welfare enhancing disclosures by firms. Further, by inducing disclosures of the right types of information while discouraging
revelation of other types, tax policy proves to be a more versatile instrument than direct regulatory attempts which can mandate
(but not prohibit) disclosures. The intuition behind our results is that when firms make decisions to disclose (or withhold)
pieces of private information, such a decision is often made with an eye on the potential for a large payoff. In such cases,
progressive taxes can dampen the appeal of big payoffs and better align the incentives of firms with those of consumers. In
short, while progressive taxes may be criticized for curbing aggressiveness, it is precisely such a decrease in aggressiveness
that can prompt efficient sharing of information. 相似文献
17.
Leonardo Becchetti Vittorio Pelligra Tommaso Reggiani 《International Tax and Public Finance》2017,24(6):1026-1049
In this paper, we study by means of a framed field experiment on a representative sample of the population the effect on people’s charitable giving of three, substantial and procedural, elements: information provision, belief elicitation and threshold on distribution. We frame this investigation within the 5X1000 tax scheme, a mechanism through which Italian taxpayers may choose to give a small proportion (0.5%) of their income tax to a voluntary organization to fund its activities. We find two main results: (i) providing information or eliciting beliefs about previous donations increases the likelihood of a donation, while thresholds have no effect; (ii) information about previous funding increases donations to organizations that received fewer donations in the past, while belief elicitation also increases donations to organizations that received most donations in the past, since individuals are more likely to donate to the organizations they rank first. 相似文献