中小股民投资收益结构的实证分析――以中小股民投资者为例

随着时代的发展,我国股市逐渐发展起来,越来越多的股民入股,但随着股市结构及政策的变化,我国的中小股民投资收益结构也发生了一定变化。本文通过对中小股民投资收益结构进行分析,研究我国股民的收益分类以及股民具体的构成,从而对我国的股民结构和公司结构进行深入研究,并且对于培养高水平且持续稳定的分红上市公司也有一定研究。     

股利分配动因与股利决策——基于上市公司股利分配决策的实证分析

股利政策对公司价值的影响、信号传递效应、股东财富效应3种股利分配动因与股利决策存在显著的正相关关系．降低代理成本效应对股利决策影响不显著。上市公司管理层股利决策的动因在于通过股利分配政策影响股票价格．传递公司盈利能力和发展前景的内部信息,帮助投资者实现超额收益．增加股东财富。而降低代理成本并不是他们分配股利的目的。     

旅游上市公司股利分配政策研究

2009年底国务院确定将旅游业培育成国民经济的战略性支柱产业和人民群众更加满意的现代服务业,这为旅游上市公司的发展带来了机遇与挑战。从国内目前研究来看,研究旅游上市公司股利分配政策的文章很少,运用整体分析、对比分析和相关性分析方法研究了近十年旅游上市公司股利分配政策呈现的特点及影响因素。研究发现,旅游上市公司股利分配政策特点鲜明并支持股利信号传递理论;相关性分析表明旅游上市公司每股现金股利与每股收益、每股净资产之间呈现中等程度相关性,每股现金股利与每股货币资金之间呈正相关性,每股现金股利与资产负债率之间呈较弱的负相关性。这说明旅游上市公司经营业绩、规模、货币资金量、资本结构对其股利分配政策有不同程度的影响。     

CLASSICAL AND IMPULSE STOCHASTIC CONTROL FOR THE OPTIMIZATION OF THE DIVIDEND AND RISK POLICIES OF AN INSURANCE FIRM

This paper deals with the dividend optimization problem for a financial or an insurance entity which can control its business activities, simultaneously reducing the risk and potential profits. It also controls the timing and the amount of dividends paid out to the shareholders. The objective of the corporation is to maximize the expected total discounted dividends paid out until the time of bankruptcy. Due to the presence of a fixed transaction cost, the resulting mathematical problem becomes a mixed classical-impulse stochastic control problem. The analytical part of the solution to this problem is reduced to quasivariational inequalities for a second-order nonlinear differential equation. We solve this problem explicitly and construct the value function together with the optimal policy. We also compute the expected time between dividend payments under the optimal policy.     

Tax‐efficient irregular payout methods: The case of B share schemes and capital repayments via a court‐approved scheme of arrangement

Advance corporation tax (ACT) increased the tax cost to UK firms of distributing cash to shareholders. We demonstrate how the tax cost arising from ACT payments affected the channels through which UK firms returned capital to shareholders. In particular, we document and describe two unconventional irregular payout methods that enabled firms to avoid paying ACT. Firms choosing these methods are associated with significantly greater ACT problems than a control sample of firms that opted for conventional self‐tender offers and special dividends. Event study tests indicate that the decision to adopt tax‐efficient payout methods created significant additional value for shareholders beyond the basic cash distribution decision.