全文获取类型
收费全文 | 43篇 |
免费 | 6篇 |
专业分类
财政金融 | 26篇 |
工业经济 | 2篇 |
计划管理 | 3篇 |
经济学 | 4篇 |
贸易经济 | 3篇 |
农业经济 | 4篇 |
经济概况 | 7篇 |
出版年
2023年 | 3篇 |
2021年 | 1篇 |
2020年 | 1篇 |
2019年 | 1篇 |
2018年 | 2篇 |
2017年 | 1篇 |
2016年 | 1篇 |
2015年 | 2篇 |
2014年 | 1篇 |
2013年 | 2篇 |
2012年 | 3篇 |
2011年 | 2篇 |
2010年 | 1篇 |
2009年 | 2篇 |
2008年 | 1篇 |
2007年 | 4篇 |
1997年 | 2篇 |
1996年 | 2篇 |
1995年 | 2篇 |
1993年 | 2篇 |
1992年 | 1篇 |
1991年 | 1篇 |
1985年 | 1篇 |
1984年 | 1篇 |
1983年 | 1篇 |
1982年 | 2篇 |
1981年 | 1篇 |
1979年 | 2篇 |
1973年 | 1篇 |
1972年 | 1篇 |
1964年 | 1篇 |
排序方式: 共有49条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
PHILIPP MAIER 《Contemporary economic policy》2010,28(3):307-321
Online auction sites like eBay provide ways to measure what consumers buy and how much they pay. Does this imply that consumers pay similar prices, irrespective of their location? Comparing prices for homogeneous, tradable goods in the euro area and the United Kingdom, we find that prices differ significantly. The differential is not related to countries' having different currencies. However, price dispersion—the variance of prices—does seem to be smaller if two countries share a common currency. Our results confirm the importance of national borders in explaining price differences and their magnitude is related to (not) sharing a common currency. (JEL E30, E31, E50, F40) 相似文献
2.
3.
Using proprietary data on stock loan fees and quantities from a large institutional investor, we examine the link between the shorting market and stock prices. Employing a unique identification strategy, we isolate shifts in the supply and demand for shorting. We find that shorting demand is an important predictor of future stock returns: An increase in shorting demand leads to negative abnormal returns of 2.98% in the following month. Second, we show that our results are stronger in environments with less public information flow, suggesting that the shorting market is an important mechanism for private information revelation. 相似文献
4.
5.
JEAN‐PHILIPPE BOUCHAUD PHILIPP KRÜGER AUGUSTIN LANDIER DAVID THESMAR 《The Journal of Finance》2019,74(2):639-674
We propose a theory of the “profitability” anomaly. In our model, investors forecast future profits using a signal and sticky belief dynamics. In this model, past profits forecast future returns (the profitability anomaly). Using analyst forecast data, we measure expectation stickiness at the firm level and find strong support for three additional model predictions: (1) analysts are on average too pessimistic regarding the future profits of high‐profit firms, (2) the profitability anomaly is stronger for stocks that are followed by stickier analysts, and (3) the profitability anomaly is stronger for stocks with more persistent profits. 相似文献
6.
We show that aversion to risk and ambiguity leads to information inertia when investors process public news about assets. Optimal portfolios do not always depend on news that is worse than expected; hence, the equilibrium stock price does not reflect this bad news. This informational inefficiency is more severe when there is more risk and ambiguity but disappears when investors are risk‐neutral or the news is about idiosyncratic risk. Information inertia leads to news momentum (e.g., after earnings announcements) and is consistent with low household trading activity. An ambiguity premium helps explain the macro and earnings announcement premium. 相似文献
7.
CRAIG DOIDGE G. ANDREW KAROLYI KARL V. LINS DARIUS P. MILLER RENÉ M. STULZ 《The Journal of Finance》2009,64(1):425-466
This paper investigates how a foreign firm's decision to cross-list on a U.S. stock exchange is related to the consumption of private benefits of control by its controlling shareholders. Theory has proposed that when private benefits are high, controlling shareholders are less likely to choose to cross-list in the United States because of constraints on the consumption of private benefits resulting from such listings. Using several proxies for private benefits related to the control and cash flow ownership rights of controlling shareholders, we find support for this hypothesis with a sample of more than 4,000 firms from 31 countries. 相似文献
8.
9.
10.
We develop a dynamic asset pricing model in which monetary policy affects the risk premium component of the cost of capital. Risk‐tolerant agents (banks) borrow from risk‐averse agents (i.e., take deposits) to fund levered investments. Leverage exposes banks to funding risk, which they insure by holding liquidity buffers. By changing the nominal rate the central bank influences the liquidity premium, and hence the cost of taking leverage. Lower nominal rates make liquidity cheaper and raise leverage, resulting in lower risk premia and higher asset prices, volatility, investment, and growth. We analyze forward guidance, a “Greenspan put,” and the yield curve. 相似文献