EXPLOITING AN ADVANTAGE--DECLINING AN ADVANTAGE

Within the context of the study, a firm is said to have an advantageover another if it obtains more customers given they both chargethe same price. Further, consumer switching costs imply thelarger the difference in the prices charged by the two firmsthe greater the proportion of consumers who switch from thehigher-priced firm to the lower-priced one. The Nash equilibriumto the price-posting game is characterized The firm with theadvantage charges a higher price Finally, it is shown that ifone firm can freely choose to have an advantage, it will rejectit. This follows as the greater the advantage, the smaller theequilibrium profits to both firms.     

Towards a Unifying Model of Systems of Law, Corporate Financing, Accounting and Corporate Governance

Several authors have observed a relationship between a country's type of legal system and its style of financial reporting. Generally, the causality is presumed to be from legal system to accounting system. However, one model of accounting differences suggests that the type of accounting is an influence on the regulatory system rather than vice versa. This helps to explain why the Netherlands has Roman law but approximately Anglo-Saxon accounting. It also allows for the extensive use by European companies of US or international rules. This paper expands on these themes, and extends the model to include corporate governance.     

MIGRATION,MEDICAL AID AND WELFARE*

This paper constructs a simple rural‐urban migration model that explicitly incorporates the interactions between the individual's migration decision, the risk of incurring an infectious disease and unemployment. We show that providing a subsidy for health investment in urban regions in the form of medical aid does not improve individual welfare. This is because it induces further urban migration, increases the risk of infection and unemployment, and offsets completely the positive cost‐reduction effect.     

A Field Study of the Review Process: Research Note

Despite the stated importance of the audit review process in auditing standards and textbooks, research on the process itself is limited. This study provides evidence on the nature and purpose of the review process by examining the actual review notes prepared by managers of a Big-6 accounting firm. A sample of twenty-eight audit engagements resulting in 3,008 separate review notes was examined. The results suggest that quality control aspects appear to be the main focus of the review process. Review notes sometimes indicated the need to gather further information and/or undertake additional testing, and provided direct as well as indirect advice on the audit approach to subordinates. Few surprises resulted from the review process, and the review notes and approaches varied among managers.