浅析经络与气功对养生的影响

经络和气功是养生的两个重要方面,都对养生产生着无可替代的影响,因此,对经络与气功的研究,对于养生来说,具有现实的积极的意义;为此,对经络与气功的各个方面及共同作用探析,将最终明确各个方面的影响。     

应对反倾销的策略

近年来，我国对外贸易快速增长，已跻身世界贸易六大强国行列。但同时，我国出口产品被反倾销、反补贴涉诉案件日益增多。针对这一情况，提出一些应对反倾销的策略和措施。     

银行为什么愿意向大企业货款

本文从行为金融学这一全新的视角，分析了我国银行贷款集中给大企业的根源，认为展望理论计算出的展望值差异，是造成国有大银行贷款集中的根源，从众心理支配下的羊群效应则是我国中小银行也争相贷款给大企业的症结所在，而造成展望值差异和羊群效应的最关键因素在于信息不对称条件下的贷款人非理性，因此，如何克服贷款市场上的信息不对称，是解决贷款集中问题的关键。     

青少年旅游市场培育模式研究

青少年旅游有其特殊的市场形成机制和旅游特征,大力培育青少年旅游市场,具有重要意义.近年来,青少年旅游呈现蓬勃发展之势,但也存在着诸多问题,真正意义上的青少年旅游市场尚未形成.培育青少年旅游市场,应该形成"服务提供者——旅游组织者——旅游提供者——旅游受众群体"各方协调合作的组织运作模式,旅游产品开发应体现娱乐性、健康性、教育性、实践性、安全性的特征,并形成良好的政策环境支持体系,从而使青少年这一特殊的旅游市场得到深度开发并日益壮大.     

Does the road to serfdom lead to the Servile State?

Hilaire Belloc's The Servile State is often seen as an antisocialist tract arguing that “socialism is slavery.” It is typically assumed that an appreciation and defense of free market capitalism, as well as a general dislike of government intervention must motivate the its thesis. Nevertheless The Servile State is an argument against what Belloc saw as unbridled capitalism not collectivism. Belloc defines capitalism to mean a state in which there is a skewed distribution of wealth in society where the majority of people are dispossessed, proletariat, and a minority makes up the capitalist, property owning class. For Belloc capitalism is an inherently unstable system and servile measures arise to ameliorate insecurity and instability.     

内控行为对商业银行经营绩效影响的深度探讨

本文采用FGLS回归分析法,实证检验了质量达标组和质量未达标组商业银行治理结构和风险控制机制对治理绩效的影响,以期揭示内部人控制行为影响银行经营业绩的路径和深度,找到银行治理低效的关键原因.研究表明,不良贷款和政府干预是影响国有商业银行治理绩效的关键性原因.股份制商业银行股本收益率高、不良贷款率低、公司治理结构较为完善,普遍存在规模经济,规模扩张有助于业绩提升,政府干预的负面影响小.     

Letter to the Editor

Re: Postma MJ, Kappelhoff BS, van Hulst M, et al. Economic evaluation of dabigatran etexilate for the primary prevention of venous tromboembolic events following major orthopedic surgery in the Netherlands. JME 2012;15(5):878–86.     

Foreword to the Symposium

This paper investigates a number of aspects of Piero Sraffa's early philosophical thinking by placing him within the historical materialist tradition of reasoning about the relation of ideas to the historical process. It first distinguishes Alfred Marshall's views about the historical development of ideas by addressing Marshall's responses to the criticisms of William Cunningham of the English Historical School. Marshall's concept of economics as a universal engine of discovery was rejected by Sraffa in his early writings. Sraffa's critique of Marshall is then argued to lead to two early philosophical commitments on Sraffa's part: that deductivist modes of explanation are inappropriate in economics and that economics aims to explain the underlying structures of causal interaction that had been the concern of the classical political economists. The paper closes with brief remarks on how Sraffa's later philosophical thinking might be approached.