基于完善无形资产转让定价税收政策研究

本文从我国无形资产转让定价税收缺乏完善的税收规范体系、我国无形资产范围缺乏全面性和统一标准以及我国独立交易原则难以得到有效利用等方面分析了目前我国无形资产转让定价税收政策存在的问题,提出了准确界定无形资产、注重无形资产预约定价安排及事后调整以及完善无形资产转移定价反避税系统等完善无形资产转让定价税收政策措施,以期为完善无形资产转让定价税收政策提供一些参考,确保我国无形资产转让定价税收工作的顺利开展。     

刍议转让定价实践中的经济分析

转让定价实践中的经济分析的着眼点在于比较,其对象是关联交易与非关联交易,其目的是判断关联交易定价是否违背了公平交易原则,进而对关联交易方之间的利润分配产生影响。结合我国转让定价相关规定和时间状况,经济分析可从财务分析、功能性分析、可比性分析三个方面展开。     

房地产关联企业转让定价涉税风险研究

内资房地产关联企业之间通过有形货物购销、劳务提供、无形资产使用及资金融通等方面的转让定价转移利润,从而达到避税的目的。随着我国反避税立法的逐步完善,反避税工作机制的逐步健全,内资房地产关联企业的转让定价已经成为税务机关反避税关注的焦点。对于存在大量关联交易业务的房地产企业而言,要规范关联交易行为,重视关联申报,有效预防、规避转让定价风险。     

我国关联交易转让定价问题研究

<正>伴随经济的迅猛发展,企业的跨国投资行为日渐增多,外商投资企业利用转让定价进行利润转移,规避税收现象日渐严重,危害了我国企业以及国家利益。本文以此为出发点,对关联交易转让定价问题进行研究,首先对关联交易和转让定价进     

基于财务视角的转让定价调整规则比较及启示——以美国、OECD和中国为例

全球税收负担最小化和企业集团整体利润最大化是跨国公司全球化经营的必然选择,运用转让定价政策进行"税收套利"交易,进而侵蚀了高税率国家的税基.为此,世界各国纷纷加大对转让定价反避税措施打击力度,加强对跨国公司转让定价的管理,以保护本国税基不受侵蚀.本文以美国、OECD和我国为例,对跨国公司转让定价调整的基本原则和主要方法进行了比较,旨在帮助跨国企业从财务视角更好地理解和掌握国际转让定价税制调整要求,规范关联交易转让定价,避免纳税风险.     

浅谈注册会计师参与预约定价制度

转让定价是指关联企业在内部交易中不按照一般市场价格的定价,其主要目的是将整个关联企业的纳税额减少到最低程度。尽管各国政府不断加强对转让定价的管理,但跨国公司通过转让定价避税的现象却一直广泛存在。据经济合作与发展组织(OECD)估计,60%以上的跨国公司之间的交易存在转让定价。转让定价扭曲了国际收入与费用的分配,一方面会影响到纳税人与各国税务当局的税收征纳关系,另一方面会影响到纳税人所在的国家之间的税收利益的分配关系。因此,各国政府都以法律的形式规定了转让定价税制,对转让定价进行某种矫正,以调整跨国公司关联企业…     

公平独立原则在转让定价中的尴尬处境及其启示

目前各国都宣称对转让定价政策奉行公平独立原则(ALP)。发达国家更是制订了许多转让定价调整办法,并以贯彻ALP为由大力向全世界推行。但这些办法在实践中无法贯彻,根本原因是非营业竞争的关联交易定价不适用ALP,所谓的ALP是由各国各行其是地解释的。这使得ALP处于明知无用但又不能抛弃的尴尬境地。预约定价制不是医治转让定弊病的灵丹妙药。我国要注重八个方面以应对跨国转让定价中的ALP难题。     

跨国公司垂直一体化转让定价问题研究

我国外商投资企业存在“四多”特点,是跨国公司垂直一体化投资方式的典型表现,因此垂直一体化直接投资转让定价问题是我国外商投资企业转让定价问题的关键。垂直一体化关联企业比垂直分离的独立企业拥有更多的无形资产优势和剩余利润,在不存在公开竞争的市场,不能用垂直分离的独立交易作为垂直一体化关联交易的可比标准,在转让定价的调整方法上应采用利润分割法处理。     

对预约定价协议程序的现实思考

随着转让定价问题的日益复杂以及预约定价协议(APA)程序自身的逐渐完善,APA程序越来越呈现出传统转让定价程序所无法比拟的优势。我国应注重对正常交易原则的坚持和遵循,并注重APA程序在期限、文件要求等方面的改进,使该程序吸引更多的纳税人参与进来,取得更大的“税企双赢”效果。     

我国转让定价税务管理中存在的问题及改进建议

外资企业在我国投资、经营过程中,存在运用转让定价等手段转移利润、逃避税收负担的问题。为了消除转让定价避税带来的危害,我国出台了一系列转让定价税务管理法律法规,不断建立健全转让定价税务管理制度,取得了一定的成效。但我国转让定价税务管理还存在诸如管理制度不完善等问题。本文认为,针对我国转让定价税务管理的现状,我们要在建立科学、完备的转让定价税收法律法规体系,扩大转让定价审计的数量和范围等方面下功夫,不断改进我国转让定价税务管理。     

跨行查询收费:替银行说几句话

银行卡跨行查询收费一经推出即遭到铺天盖地的反对,有的消费者甚至诉诸法庭。银行收取跨行查询费的行为究竟是出于对市场化原则的尊重还是蔑视?     

Managing for efficiency, managing for equity

It is a truism that not all managers do the same things in the same ways. Less often recognized, however, is the fact that the essential tasks and goals of management are not everywhere the same. Indeed, so unlike each other are the two primary systems of management--the "technocratic" and the "political"--that they consistently vary in the implicit contract offered to participants, the career path of members, the use of organizational structure, the choice of purpose, and the allocation of resources, but also provides a conceptual framework for understanding why they happen and what can be done to prevent their happening in the future.     

寿险产品评价体系研究

中国保险市场的发展,迫切需要建立保险评价体系.保险产品的评价体系是保险评价的核心,其主要目标是以保险产品相对透明为目的进行的.在所有的保险产品中,人身保险产品与社会大众关系最为密切,人身保险在保险业的保费收入中也占有决定性地位.所以,当务之急是首先建立人身保险产品的评价体系.寿险保单的保障程度、投资价值以及附带的服务水平是寿险产品的核心问题,应当成为寿险产品评价的主要内容.本文重点从寿险产品保障程度进行评价研究.     

微笑传递快乐 激情奉献奥运

前言：在2008年北京奥运会上,奥运志愿者成为了一道亮丽的风景线,他们用自己最美的微笑和热情的服务给世界留下了深刻的印象。在这个充满青春朝气的群体中,也活跃着财政青年的身影,他们以40天辛勤付出和无私奉献,圆满完成使命,为北京奥运的成功举办贡献了力量,也留下人生中美好的回忆。现刊载中评协奥运志愿者——李念辰和崔新园的文章,将他们辛苦工作的经历再现,让他们的欢乐与广大读者共享。     

Trust for accounting and accounting for trust

This paper combines insights from the sociology of knowledge and the emerging practice-based literature on learning and knowing to extend the institutional framework of accounting change developed by Burns and Scapens [Burns, J., Scapens, R.W., 2000. Conceptualising management accounting change: an institutional framework. Manage. Acc. Res., 11, 3–25]. In particular, it explores how management accounting systems (MAS) can be implicated in processes of learning and culture change, and used to identify ‘trustworthy’ solutions in the face of organisational crises. A case study of an Italian company, which was subject to massive change following its acquisition by General Electric, is used to discuss how, when crises arise and organisation members find themselves under intense pressure for change, their rationales and routinised behaviour, which are driven by the existing knowledge and cultural assumptions, are challenged. The case illustrates how MAS can act as sources of trust for the processes of change – i.e., accounting for trust; while at the same time being socially constructed objects of trust – i.e., trust for accounting. Drawing on the concept of personal trust and the notion of roles as access points to organisational (expert) systems, the paper discusses how, in this case, finance experts facilitated the acceptance and progressive sharing of new rationales and routines. Clearly, this does not guarantee that change will occur or occur in some ‘desired’ direction in other cases, but it increases the possibility of replacing trust in the predictability of routines with feelings of trust for change.     

Accounting for decisions and decisions for accounting

Behavioral decision theory (BDT) is concerned with “accounting for decisions”. The development of this interdisciplinary field is traced from the appearance of several key publications in the 1950s to the present. Whereas the 1960s saw increasing theoretical and empirical work, the field really started to flourish in the 1970s with the appearance of the review by Slovic & Lichtenstein (Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, pp. 549–744, 1971), and key papers on probabilistic judgment (Tversky & Kahneman, Science, pp. 1124–1131, 1974), and choice (Kahneman & Tversky, Econometrica, pp. 263–291, 1979). From the early 1980s to the present, BDT has seen considerable consolidation and expansion and its influence now permeates many fields of enquiry. After this brief history, eight major ideas or findings are discussed. These are: (1) that judgment can be modeled; (2) bounded rationality; (3) to understand decision making, understanding the task is more important than understanding the people; (4) levels of aspiration/reference points; (5) use of heuristic rules; (6) the importance of adding; (7) search for confirmation; and (8) thought as construction. Next, comments are addressed to differences between BDT and problem solving/cognitive science. It is argued that whereas many substantive differences are artificial, two distinct communities of researchers do exist. This is followed by a discussion of some major shortcomings currently facing BDT that include questions about the robustness of findings as well as overconcern with a few specific, “paradoxial” results. On the other hand, there are many interesting issues that BDT could address and several specific suggestions are made. Moreover, these issues represent opportunities for accounting research and several are enumerated. Finally, BDT presents “decisions for accounting” in the sense that scarce resources need to be allocated to different types of research that could illuminate accounting issues. The argument is made that BDT is one research metaphor or paradigm that has proved useful in accounting and that should be supported. Such support, however, may mean that some researchers may work on issues that, at first blush, might seem distant from accounting per se.     

关于《以财务报告为目的的评估指南（试行）》的起草说明

为适应新兴评估市场领域的发展,规范注册资产评估师执行以财务报告为目的的评估业务,保证评估执业质量,维护社会公共利益和资产评估各方当事人合法权益,中评协在财政部有关司局的帮助和指导下,组织有关专家起草了《以财务报告为目的的评估指南（试行）》（以下简称《指南》）。为便于评估机构和注册资产评估师以及相关部门、人士全面理解《指南》,现将有关起草情况说明如下。