信任研究在创业团队中应用及思考

团队创业是现代创业活动中最常见的形式,信任和稳定是促进创业团队取得成功的坚实基础.文章在回顾信任相关研究的基础上,从创业团队的信任模式、创业团队信任的前后因变量和创业团队的信任变化三个方面对创业团队的信任研究应用进行了思考,旨在为现实中创业团队的稳定性和创业成功提供理论借鉴.     

创业团队异质性与团队互动、决策绩效的关系路径:一项多案例研究

在创业实践中,创业团队内部的构成、协作与管理是影响创业成败的重要因素,而创业团队成员个体间的差异则会显著影响创业团队的行为,并最终对创业活动的成败产生至关重要的影响.本文从团队理论和社会认同理论视角出发,采用多案例研究的方法,针对JG公司、ZM公司、WX公司等3家创业型企业展开了系统性的研究.通过对案例中获取的资料进行规范性编码,本研究对创业团队异质性、团队互动、团队决策绩效在创业情景下的结构维度进行了重新提炼与界定;进一步,本文得到了创业团队异质性与团队互动、决策绩效的三条重要关系路径:社会型异质性—团队沟通—决策质量,社会型异质性—团队协作—决策满意度,价值观类异质性—团队沟通—决策质量.在此基础上,本文为创业团队的组建与发展提出了建议.     

创业团队研究动态探讨

创业团队日益普遍的出现和存在,其创业绩效要好于个体创业的创业绩效,创业团队的组成是以情感的纽带为基础、为起始,以专长的互补为辅、为继。创业团队是有领导的。     

创业团队的组建与激励问题研究

创业是一种复杂的社会现象，创业的风险与收益并存于创业的整个过程之中。相关研究表明，创业团队对创业企业的生存与发展起着重要的作用。随着创业企业组织规模的不断扩大，除队员能力与发展方向与组织的要求不相适应之外。更多的冲突和矛盾来自创业团队的组建阶段以及团队的后期管理上。本文结合创业团队的固有特点。指出保持创业团队动态稳定的关键因素。即：合理组建创业团队，加强团队管理，建立行之有效的激励机制。     

虚拟团队变革型和交易型领导对团队创造力的影响机理:共享领导视角

传统的垂直领导者如何在虚拟团队情境下提升团队创造力,既是管理者面临的挑战,也是理论研究的一个新主题.本研究基于团队成员共享领导视角,探究虚拟团队垂直变革型和交易型领导对团队创造力的作用机理.采用来自66个虚拟团队的241位成员和66位主管配套问卷的有效数据,实证分析表明:虚拟团队变革型和交易型领导均能促进团队成员共享领导,进而提升团队创造力;团队虚拟性作为一个连续性概念,调节虚拟团队变革型和交易型领导对团队成员共享领导的正向影响,并调节虚拟团队变革型领导通过团队成员共享领导对团队创造力的正向影响.研究结果对虚拟团队领导力发展和团队创造力管理具有重要的理论指导意义.     

创业团队组建管理与激励机制研究

大部分的新创企业是由创业团队组建的,团队创业已经成为现在主要的创业方式。本文基于双因素理论探讨了创业团队的组建与激励方式,结合新东方的案例分析了企业如何通过合理搭配团队人员、设计激励机制增加创业成功率。     

创业团队的组建与激励问题研究

创业是一种复杂的社会现象,创业的风险与收益并存于创业的整个过程之中.相关研究表明,创业团队对创业企业的生存与发展起着重要的作用.随着创业企业组织规模的不断扩大,除队员能力与发展方向与组织的要求不相适应之外,更多的冲突和矛盾来自创业团队的组建阶段以及团队的后期管理上.本文结合创业团队的固有特点,指出保持创业团队动态稳定的关键因素,即合理组建创业团队,加强团队管理,建立行之有效的激励机制.     

如何建立良好的创业团队成员心理契约关系

创业团队成员与企业之间存在着一定的心理契约,这种心理契约可能会对创业团队的企业家精神、团队的稳定、创业绩效等造成重要影响,进而影响到新创企业的生存状况、成长速度和发展方向。创业是指创业者通过创新手段,有效利用各种资源,创造出新的价值并实现商机的活动。随着知识经济的兴起,团队创业现象日益普遍,创业团队研究也成为理论研究的热点。目前,学者主要围绕创业团队结     

创业型领导研究述评

创业型领导是组织获取竞争优势并持续创造价值的关键驱动因素。本文首先介绍了创业型领导的内涵、结构特征主要研究模型,对相关的实证研究进展做了归纳和总结,同时提出了创业型领导研究的下一步方向。     

创业团队的最佳结构模式

为什么成功的创业管理能将分歧和冲突转变为正面决策？团队创业的成功率并不比个人创业高，其主要原因不外乎两点：一是团队失败于决策分歧；二是团队困于利益冲突。有效的创业团队管理要解决决策分歧和利益冲突的问题，而这有赖于创业团队找到适合的结构模式。创业团队管理的特殊之处 创业团队的管理不同于工作团队的管理。对于大多数企业内的工作团队来说，如研发团队、销售团队和项目团队等，因为人员和岗位稳定性相对较高，人们习惯性地将重点放在过程管理上，注重通过建设沟通机制、决策机制、互动机制和激励机制等发挥集体智慧，实现优势互补，提升绩效。     

Leader Emergence in Nascent Venture Teams: The Critical Roles of Individual Emotion Regulation and Team Emotions

This study advances a theory of how different aspects of emotion regulation influence individual leader emergence in the intensely emotional context of nascent venture teams. Despite the growing amount of research on the role of leadership in the entrepreneurial process, the emergence of leaders in nascent venture teams has rarely been explored. Drawing on theories and research on leadership emergence and emotion regulation, we argue that the two aspects of emotion regulation (i.e., reappraisal and suppression) exert opposite effects on the degree to which nascent venture team members come to perceive an individual as a leader. We also theorize that team emotions arising from affective events moderate the relationship between reappraisal and leader emergence in such teams. Data from 103 nascent venture teams without prior leaders show a negative relationship between individuals’ trait disposition to suppress emotions and their emergence as leaders, and a positive relationship between their trait disposition to reappraise emotions and their emergence as leaders. Moreover, we find that negative team emotions magnify the positive association between reappraisal and leader emergence, while positive team emotions mitigate it. We discuss the implications of our findings for the literature on entrepreneurial leadership, entrepreneurial emotions, and leadership in general.     

上行何以下效?创业型领导对员工越轨创新的影响

通过采用226位领导者-员工的调研数据,以积极情绪的扩展-构建理论及工作要求-资源模型为基础,基于感性与理性双路径,通过实证检验,得到以下研究结论:创业型领导能够正向预测员工越轨创新;工作繁荣在感性路径中起中介作用,工作重塑在理性路径中起到中介作用;社会自我效能感在创业型领导与工作繁荣的感性路径中,以及在创业型领导与工作重塑的理性路径中均起到正向调节作用;社会自我效能感同时也调节了工作繁荣与工作重塑的中介效应。基于此,提出了选拔及培育创业型领导、营造“自由决策”氛围、形成鼓励创新制度、构建容错文化、制定基于“结果”衡量创新的制度,以激励并管理越轨创新。     

Examining the influence of servant and entrepreneurial leadership on the work outcomes of employees in social enterprises

Abstract

The present study examines the relative influence of two distinct leadership styles, servant leadership and entrepreneurial leadership, on the organizational commitment and innovative behavior of employees working in social enterprises. Analyzing data from 169 employees and 42 social entrepreneurs, we found that, although servant leadership was positively related to followers’ organizational commitment, the relationship between entrepreneurial leadership and organizational commitment was insignificant. In contrast, whilst we found evidence that entrepreneurial leadership was positively related to followers’ innovative behavior, the relationship between servant leadership and employees’ innovative behavior was insignificant. Our research contributes to the underdeveloped literature on leadership in social enterprises by exploring the relative effectiveness of different leadership styles (namely an entrepreneurial leadership style and a servant leadership style) in promoting follower work attitudes and behaviors in social enterprises. In addition, our research demonstrates the importance of leadership over and above followers’ individual differences such as pro-social motivation and creative self-efficacy.     

Inspirational leadership,positive mood,and team innovation: A moderated mediation investigation into the pivotal role of professional salience

Multidisciplinary teams are increasingly advocated for in healthcare policy consequent to their capacity to develop innovative solutions to seemingly intractable service and care challenges. Recent arguments that inspirational leadership styles may foster innovation in multidisciplinary teams point to their potential value in this effort. However, inconsistency in the capacity of such leaders to engender innovation highlights the need to understand the mechanisms and boundary conditions that determine when such leadership generates positive effects. We argue that follower positive mood acts to mediate the path between inspirational leadership and innovation and may account for its variable effects. By increasing positive team mood, inspirational leaders can potentially bring about more flexible thinking and enhance innovation but can also increase reliance on less effortful information processing, undermining innovative potential. In an effort to address the dilemma posed by these contrasting effects, we propose that professional salience acts as an important boundary condition of this relationship such that only when profession is salient do inspirational leaders enhance multidisciplinary team innovation through positive mood. An analysis of survey data from 60 UK‐based multidisciplinary healthcare teams, investigating the inspirational leadership of practice‐based innovation, supports our moderated mediation model. Finally, the implications for HRM are considered, specifically for leader development and work team design.     

Entrepreneurial Leadership as Creative Brokering: The Process and Practice of Co-creating and Advancing Opportunity

How does entrepreneurial leadership drive the process of forming and advancing opportunity? Drawing from an ethnographic field study of Nashville music producers, I develop a model of entrepreneurial leadership as creative brokering – the practices and process by which entrepreneurs lead and mobilize a complex network of actors in co-creating and advancing opportunity. I find that entrepreneurial leaders encounter three tensions as they advance this process: 1) generating novel ideas and fitting them within the competitive landscape; 2) incubating opportunity and seizing the moment in the market; and 3) fostering experimentation and navigating hyper-competition. I show when these tensions arise and identify six creative brokering practices through which leaders leverage their brokerage role to navigate these tensions in order to move opportunity forward. The paper offers a model of entrepreneurial leadership as creative brokering, extends extant creative brokering scholarship to consider more distal market actors, and shows how creative brokering and leadership towards creative outcomes involve iteratively stepping forward to infuse market perspective and exert control, and stepping back to let others shine and co-create ideas.     

企业高管团队整合领导力提升的行动学习模式

讨论了高管团队整合领导力及其与企业绩效的关系，分析了企业高管团队整合领导力运行机理，应用系统工程理论方法，构建了企业高管团队整合领导力系统运行模型。概括总结了行动学习原理以及研究理论，指出了企业高管团队整合领导力提升的关键要素，在此基础上，应用经验学习循环和群体动力学理论方法，构建了基于行动学习的高管团队整合领导力培育“3循环”学习模式。从而，为企业高管团队整合领导力的培育与提升提供了一点粗浅的新思路和方法。     

Sink or Swim: Empowering Leadership and Overload in Teams' Ability to Deal with the Unexpected

The notion of improvisation has recently emerged in managerial studies as a viable solution to flexibly dealing with unexpected occurrences in work environments. However, past research on team improvisation has overlooked the contingencies that allow teams to effectively improvise. Drawing upon demand‐control theory, we investigate how empowering leadership and overload affect the improvisation‐performance relationship in the context of 48 work teams. Our results suggest that empowering leadership positively moderates the relationship between improvisation and performance, while overload attenuates the same relationship. Moreover, we found a joint effect of overload and empowering leadership influencing the improvisation‐performance link, such that improvisation is most positively related to performance when empowering leadership is high and overload is low. Conversely, we found that empowering leadership is particularly detrimental to the improvisation‐performance relationship when team members perceive high degrees of overload. Our findings make important contributions to the extant team literature as well as to the emerging literature on team improvisation. We outline several significant insights for HR managers and team leaders who are responsible for supporting teams that face unexpected events in the work environment. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

高校科研团队领导胜任力模型的构建

文章以高校科研团队领导为研究对象,在学习借鉴目前胜任力理论和实践经验的基础上,采用文献分析法和行为事件访谈法提炼出科研团队领导的33项胜任特征要素,然后通过问卷调查与统计分析,探索建立了高校科研团队领导胜任力模型。     

Enabling Shared Leadership in Virtual Project Teams: A Practitioners' Guide

Many virtual project teams perform better when leadership is shared (rather than centralized with the formal team leader); however, team leaders are often neither prepared to identify shared leadership potential nor to actually share leadership responsibility. Based on a study of 96 globally dispersed software development teams we show that team leaders tend to underestimate the team members’ capacity to lead themselves. As a consequence, these leaders monopolize decision‐making authority and provide insufficient levels of autonomy for team members to tackle their tasks. Preventing the team members from unfolding their true potential, these leaders unconsciously jeopardize virtual team performance. Paradoxically, it is thus team leaders themselves hindering leadership effectiveness in virtual teams.