共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 156 毫秒
1.
2.
基金投资风格的持续性研究:原因与结果 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
本文以2006至2010年期间所有开放式股票型非指数型基金为样本,实证研究基金投资风格的持续性以及基金转变投资风格的原因和结果。研究发现:(1)基金的大盘/小盘风格具有一定的持续性,但是价值/成长风格不具有持续性;(2)基金总体上并没有表现出明显的风格择时能力,而过去的业绩是影响基金投资风格发现转变的一个重要原因;(3)适当地改变大盘/小盘风格、适当地保持价值/成长风格有利于提高未来的业绩。 相似文献
3.
3月30日,建信基金管理公司又一次站在了基金业最高的领奖台上。在2013年中国基金业的"奥斯卡"奖——金牛奖评选中,建信基金蝉联"金牛基金管理公司"奖。同时,旗下产品"建信核心精选股票基金"和"建信优势动力封闭基金"分获"三年期股票型金牛基金"奖和"三年期封闭式金牛基金"奖。这些奖项不仅是对建信基金的投资文化与投资业绩的肯定,更是对其多年来坚持价值投资和不懈为持有人创造满意投资回报的褒奖。 相似文献
4.
在次贷危机的背景下,美国的灵活策略国际基金凭借既能投资成熟市场的大盘型股票,也可投资于新兴市场的小盘型股票的灵活多变的投资风格而颇受青睐.此类基金不仅可以作为国际基金单独持有,也可以作为投资组合的卫星型基金(即在投资组合里处于辅助地位的基金).也就是说,一只投资分散的增长型国际基金,可以作为一只保守的大盘型价值国际基金的卫星基金. 相似文献
5.
6.
7.
8.
《武汉金融》2019,(9)
本文检验了中国基金市场投资者的地域偏好。通过回归结果表明:基金投资者存在一定程度的地域偏好,并且更倾向于投资相同经济地区的股票;基金投资者的地域偏好在2007年以后表现得更为显著,且不同地区的基金投资者地域偏好程度差异较大。这种地域偏好的存在是因为基金投资者持有的本地股票比非本地股票能获得更高的收益,这种差异显示了基金投资者能发掘本地公司信息,并通过信息优势获利。本文还发现小规模基金、管理费率低的基金和封闭式基金更倾向于投资本地资产,且小规模基金、管理费率高的基金和开放式基金在投资中有更优表现。此外,地域偏好使基金投资者在本地投资中获得了更好的绩效,因此,监管部门需注意改善公司信息披露质量,以减轻信息不对称。 相似文献
9.
10.
该文通过建立基金风格轮换能力检验模型,从市场择时、小盘/大盘、价值/成长和惯性四种风格层面,对在2004年之前成立的32只开放武股票型基金实证研究.结果发现基金总体上有显著的小盘/大盘风格轮换能力,但没有表现出显著的选股能力、市场择时能力和价值/成长风格轮换能力,有证据显示基金普遍采取了激进的正反馈投资策略,这尤其在熊市时期表现更为突出. 相似文献
11.
12.
基金投资风格的极端性与业绩研究 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
本文首次从综合性视角考察基金投资风格的极端性与其业绩之间的关系。采用投资风格极端性指数和行业集中度作为投资风格的测度,研究发现投资风格的极端性与基金业绩成反比,即投资风格越极端,基金的收益越差。因此,我们建议基金经理在做出投资策略时,应当遵循稳健的投资风格与分散化投资,当发现自己的投资组合风险较大或有明显的行业偏重时,及时做出调整。对于风格极端的基金投资组合,应保持谨慎的态度。 相似文献
13.
Zhe Chen David R. Gallagher Graham Harman Geoffrey J. Warren Lihui Xi 《Accounting & Finance》2020,60(4):3407-3446
We model the tax drag from active fund management based on reported monthly holdings of active equity funds. Tax drag erodes 65 percent of the 0.74 percent excess return in Broad Market funds, but only 21 percent of the 1.80 percent excess return in Small-Cap funds for Australian superannuation (pension) fund investors. Tax drag varies with investment style; market state, which is most detrimental during bull markets; and fund turnover. For high-income individual investors, tax drag is exacerbated to the extent that active management only generates meaningful after-tax excess return for Small-Cap funds of certain styles. 相似文献
14.
刘小莉 《中央财经大学学报》2001,(9):24-29
本文从三个方面对2000年基金年报信息进行了剖析。第一,从多角度对33只证券投资基金进行分类的结果表明,最能体现基金业绩与投资风格差异度的分类方法不是基金的投资目标而是基金管理公司。基金管理公司内部的资源共享是造成这一现象的原因。第二,指数型基金在2000年的表现尚不尽人意,投资理念亦不清晰。第三,保险公司选择基金的标准相当理性,注重基金的分红市价比、夏普指数、资产净值收益率几项指标,其选择的正确性亦得到2000年基金业绩的证实。 相似文献
15.
Investment returns on closed‐end funds are highly volatile. Because expenses have a definite negative impact on closed‐end fund returns, investors should include the expense ratio as a criterion for fund selection in addition to performance, investment objective, and risk of the fund. This paper constructs a model of the expense ratio of closed‐end funds to explain cross‐sectional differences in the expense ratios for the period between 1989–1996. We relate closed‐end fund expenses to fund characteristics and identify the factors that can help investors choose low expense closed‐end funds. 相似文献
16.
Style Drift in Private Equity 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
Douglas Cumming Grant Fleming Armin Schwienbacher 《Journal of Business Finance & Accounting》2009,36(5-6):645-678
Abstract: We introduce the concept of style drift to private equity investment. We present theory and evidence pertaining to style drifts in terms of a fund manager's stated focus on particular stages of entrepreneurial development. We develop a model that derives conditions under which style drifts are less likely among younger fund managers. We also show ways in which changes in market conditions can affect style drifts, and differences for funds committed to early-stage investments compared to funds committed to late-stage investments. We find some evidence of a positive relation between style drifting and investment performance. 相似文献
17.
本文通过一个两期模型,刻画了基金业绩如何通过影响市场信念,进而影响基金风格漂移和基金公司的解雇行为。若上期基金业绩很好,基金经理就会在乐观的自我能力预期下,完全按照自己的判断选择基金投资风格;若上期业绩一般,基金经理会因为调整成本而不太愿意切换投资风格;而若上期业绩很差导致自我能力预期悲观,基金经理就宁愿模仿上期绩优基金的投资风格。综合起来,基金风格漂移将随上期基金业绩呈现出显著的U型关系。进一步,因为业绩很差的基金经理会采取模仿策略,因此在市场风格发生切换时更有可能发生基金经理解雇事件。此外,本文基于中国开放式基金的季度数据,检验了风格漂移与滞后一期基金业绩之间的关系,经验证据稳健地支持了理论分析的各种结论。 相似文献
18.
This paper tests the alternative hypotheses of investment selection skills versus overconfidence of equity mutual funds managers in Taiwan. We find that fund holdings’ concentration levels are high and positively related to funds’ risk-adjusted returns in tranquil market periods; however, the concentration levels are low and more negatively related to risk-adjusted returns in turmoil market periods. The time varying concentration-performance relation is not driven by fund size. Our finding implies that fund managers have superior investment selection skills when the market is less volatile, but they exhibit overconfidence when the market is in turmoil, suggesting an investment strategy of shifting from concentrated funds to more broadly diversified funds when market condition becomes worse. 相似文献
19.
本文通过一个两期模型,刻画了基金业绩如何通过影响市场信念,进而影响基金风格漂移和基金公司的解雇行为。若上期基金业绩很好,基金经理就会在乐观的自我能力预期下,完全按照自己的判断选择基金投资风格;若上期业绩一般,基金经理会因为调整成本而不太愿意切换投资风格;而若上期业绩很差导致自我能力预期悲观,基金经理就宁愿模仿上期绩优基金的投资风格。综合起来,基金风格漂移将随上期基金业绩呈现出显著的U型关系。进一步,因为业绩很差的基金经理会采取模仿策略,因此在市场风格发生切换时更有可能发生基金经理解雇事件。此外,本文基于中国开放式基金的季度数据,检验了风格漂移与滞后一期基金业绩之间的关系,经验证据稳健地支持了理论分析的各种结论。 相似文献
20.
We develop a new rating of mutual funds: the atpRating. The atpRating assigns crowns to each individual mutual fund based upon the costs an investor pays when investing in the fund in relation to what it would cost to invest in the fund's peers. Within each investment category, the rating assigns five crowns to funds with the lowest costs and one crown to funds with the highest costs.We investigate the ability of the atpRating to predict the future performance of a fund. We find that an investor who has invested in the funds with the lowest costs within an investment category would have obtained a risk-adjusted excess return that is approximately 3–4 percentage points higher per annum than if the funds with the highest costs had been invested in.We compare the atpRating with the Morningstar Rating. We show that one reason why the atpRating and the Morningstar Rating contain different information is that the returns Morningstar uses as inputs when rating funds are highly volatile whereas the costs the atpRating uses as inputs when rating funds are highly persistent. In other words, a fund that has low costs one year will most likely also have low costs the following year, whereas the return of a fund in a certain year generally contains only little information about the future return that the fund will generate.Finally, we have information on the investments in different mutual funds made by a small subgroup of investors known to have been exposed to both the atpRating and the Morningstar Rating. We find that investors have clear preferences for funds rated high by both the atpRating and the Morningstar Rating. 相似文献