辖区动态

〉〉广东试点发行百亿中期票据支持基建破解资金困局。2009年3月9日，广东省首批试点发行的100亿元中期票据正式在银行间市场亮相，并将筹集的100亿元资金全部用于珠三角城际轨道交通项目建设。面对巨大的资金缺口，中期票据正成为中国地方政府破解资金困局的新渠道。根据公告，广东省财政厅将在省级国有资本经营预算设立偿债备用金，     

中期票据市场发展的国际经验

中期票据主要是指一种经监管当局一次注册批准后、在注册期限内可以分批发行的企业融资性票据,与公司债相比,中期票据在筹资成本、发行灵活性和筹资保密性等方面具有一定优势。文章介绍了国际中期票据市场的发展历史和现状,以及在传统中期票据基础之上的结构化中期票据品种的主要原理和发展状况。     

我国商业银行投资中期票据的利率风险研究

中期票据于2008年4月在我国银行间债券市场正式推出,在不到两年的时间里,已经成长为企业直接融资的重要途径之一。而在现阶段,理论界和金融业界对中期票据的研究则集中在中期票据对企业融资方式及商业银行传统贷款业务的影响方面。本文拟从中期票据最主要的投资者——商业银行的视角出发,对中期票据的利率风险进行较为详细的研究,不仅利于商业银行改善其对中期票据利率风险的管理效果,而且有利于我国中期票据市场的发展和完善。     

上市公司中期票据融资的影响因素研究

本文以发行中期票据的A股上市公司为样本,通过配对样本研究以及Logistic判定分析方法,从企业财务特征视角深入研究影响企业发行中期票据的相关因素。研究结果表明,中期票据已经成为企业代替中期贷款的重要融资形式;同配对样本相比,发行中期票据的上市公司具有较大的规模、较高的财务成本以及较低的财务杠杆和经营风险,即公司规模与财务成本越高,财务杠杆与经营风险越低,则公司发行中期票据的概率越高。     

我国启动中期票据市场对银行业的影响

中期票据市场的启动在我国金融业引起强烈反响.本文从国内外关于中期票据的定义出发,剖析了我国中期票据的金融创新之处,介绍了成熟市场中期票据发行的准备工作和参与者职责,解读了我国中期票据市场的管理规则,总结了我国推出此业务的重要意义,分析了它会给银行业带来的影响,最后针对银行业提出大力推进此业务的政策建议.     

发展银行间市场中期票据业务的重要性分析

银行间市场中期票据成功推出具有重要意义：中期票据是变革银行间市场发行体制．推动金融创新的重要举措；中期票据是发展场外市场，构建多层次资本市场体系的重要举措；中期票据是调整融资结构，提高直接融资比重的重要举措；中期票据是优化信用债券品种结构，完善信用债券期限结构的重要举措；中期票据是完善货币政策传导机制，改善宏观调控的重要举措。本文还对银行间非金融企业债券市场存在的问题提出了几点对策建议。     

中期票据与企业债市场流动性的对比分析

流动性越高,金融产品的价格就会更加市场化.本文通过考察中期票据的流动性,验证中期票据比以往的相似融资工具--企业债更加适合市场的需求,进而对中期票据和企业债两种融资工具在发行制度和理念上进行对比分析,得出了中期票据在制度上更加适应市场化需求的原因,并提出相关政策建议.     

浅谈中期票据在企业融资中的利弊

随着市场环境的变化，中期票据业务在国内债券市场已成为企业融资的重要手段。本文通过分析国内中期票据市场发展现状，比较各种债券融资的不同，探讨中期票据在企业融资中的利弊。     

发展中期票据填补公司债市场空白

从国外经验来看，公司债券市场应该包括商业票据，中期票据和公司债券这三个组成部分，文章介绍了中用票据的起源和发展历程，认为相比其他两个部分，中期票据不仅是非金融企业重要的融贸工具，更是金融中介机构为客户量身定制金融产品的主要载体。发展中期票据，有助于填补覆国公司债市场的空白。     

中期票据市场发展与长效性债务融资创新

本文对迄今为止我国发行的所有中期票据样本进行了描述性统计,并通过这些样本分析总结了我国中期票据市场发展的特点及趋势,然后,运用Jonckheere-Terpstra检验方法对影响发行利率的因素进行了实证分析,最后,结合一个实际案例提出了企业进行中期票据融资创新实践的路径。     

跨行查询收费:替银行说几句话

银行卡跨行查询收费一经推出即遭到铺天盖地的反对,有的消费者甚至诉诸法庭。银行收取跨行查询费的行为究竟是出于对市场化原则的尊重还是蔑视?     

Managing for efficiency, managing for equity

It is a truism that not all managers do the same things in the same ways. Less often recognized, however, is the fact that the essential tasks and goals of management are not everywhere the same. Indeed, so unlike each other are the two primary systems of management--the "technocratic" and the "political"--that they consistently vary in the implicit contract offered to participants, the career path of members, the use of organizational structure, the choice of purpose, and the allocation of resources, but also provides a conceptual framework for understanding why they happen and what can be done to prevent their happening in the future.     

寿险产品评价体系研究

中国保险市场的发展,迫切需要建立保险评价体系.保险产品的评价体系是保险评价的核心,其主要目标是以保险产品相对透明为目的进行的.在所有的保险产品中,人身保险产品与社会大众关系最为密切,人身保险在保险业的保费收入中也占有决定性地位.所以,当务之急是首先建立人身保险产品的评价体系.寿险保单的保障程度、投资价值以及附带的服务水平是寿险产品的核心问题,应当成为寿险产品评价的主要内容.本文重点从寿险产品保障程度进行评价研究.     

微笑传递快乐 激情奉献奥运

前言：在2008年北京奥运会上,奥运志愿者成为了一道亮丽的风景线,他们用自己最美的微笑和热情的服务给世界留下了深刻的印象。在这个充满青春朝气的群体中,也活跃着财政青年的身影,他们以40天辛勤付出和无私奉献,圆满完成使命,为北京奥运的成功举办贡献了力量,也留下人生中美好的回忆。现刊载中评协奥运志愿者——李念辰和崔新园的文章,将他们辛苦工作的经历再现,让他们的欢乐与广大读者共享。     

Trust for accounting and accounting for trust

This paper combines insights from the sociology of knowledge and the emerging practice-based literature on learning and knowing to extend the institutional framework of accounting change developed by Burns and Scapens [Burns, J., Scapens, R.W., 2000. Conceptualising management accounting change: an institutional framework. Manage. Acc. Res., 11, 3–25]. In particular, it explores how management accounting systems (MAS) can be implicated in processes of learning and culture change, and used to identify ‘trustworthy’ solutions in the face of organisational crises. A case study of an Italian company, which was subject to massive change following its acquisition by General Electric, is used to discuss how, when crises arise and organisation members find themselves under intense pressure for change, their rationales and routinised behaviour, which are driven by the existing knowledge and cultural assumptions, are challenged. The case illustrates how MAS can act as sources of trust for the processes of change – i.e., accounting for trust; while at the same time being socially constructed objects of trust – i.e., trust for accounting. Drawing on the concept of personal trust and the notion of roles as access points to organisational (expert) systems, the paper discusses how, in this case, finance experts facilitated the acceptance and progressive sharing of new rationales and routines. Clearly, this does not guarantee that change will occur or occur in some ‘desired’ direction in other cases, but it increases the possibility of replacing trust in the predictability of routines with feelings of trust for change.     

关于《以财务报告为目的的评估指南（试行）》的起草说明

为适应新兴评估市场领域的发展,规范注册资产评估师执行以财务报告为目的的评估业务,保证评估执业质量,维护社会公共利益和资产评估各方当事人合法权益,中评协在财政部有关司局的帮助和指导下,组织有关专家起草了《以财务报告为目的的评估指南（试行）》（以下简称《指南》）。为便于评估机构和注册资产评估师以及相关部门、人士全面理解《指南》,现将有关起草情况说明如下。     

Accounting for decisions and decisions for accounting

Behavioral decision theory (BDT) is concerned with “accounting for decisions”. The development of this interdisciplinary field is traced from the appearance of several key publications in the 1950s to the present. Whereas the 1960s saw increasing theoretical and empirical work, the field really started to flourish in the 1970s with the appearance of the review by Slovic & Lichtenstein (Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, pp. 549–744, 1971), and key papers on probabilistic judgment (Tversky & Kahneman, Science, pp. 1124–1131, 1974), and choice (Kahneman & Tversky, Econometrica, pp. 263–291, 1979). From the early 1980s to the present, BDT has seen considerable consolidation and expansion and its influence now permeates many fields of enquiry. After this brief history, eight major ideas or findings are discussed. These are: (1) that judgment can be modeled; (2) bounded rationality; (3) to understand decision making, understanding the task is more important than understanding the people; (4) levels of aspiration/reference points; (5) use of heuristic rules; (6) the importance of adding; (7) search for confirmation; and (8) thought as construction. Next, comments are addressed to differences between BDT and problem solving/cognitive science. It is argued that whereas many substantive differences are artificial, two distinct communities of researchers do exist. This is followed by a discussion of some major shortcomings currently facing BDT that include questions about the robustness of findings as well as overconcern with a few specific, “paradoxial” results. On the other hand, there are many interesting issues that BDT could address and several specific suggestions are made. Moreover, these issues represent opportunities for accounting research and several are enumerated. Finally, BDT presents “decisions for accounting” in the sense that scarce resources need to be allocated to different types of research that could illuminate accounting issues. The argument is made that BDT is one research metaphor or paradigm that has proved useful in accounting and that should be supported. Such support, however, may mean that some researchers may work on issues that, at first blush, might seem distant from accounting per se.