QE3刺激中国股市

9月13日,美联储议息会议决议,将会在每个月购买400亿美国长期债券,直到2012年年底;同时保持低利率政策直到2015年;这两项合在一起,实际上构成了第三轮量化宽松政策(QE3)。QE3的推出,势必压低美元的比价,由此,全球股指持续升高;黄金、原油、有色金属价格弹涨。市场的理解是,当前全球疲软的经济走势,可能与美联储一样,需要QE3以     

QE3风波下美债遭质疑

美联储实施QE3的可能性不大,隐性量化宽松政策的实施将使得美国国债市场不会遭受较大影响。美国第二轮量化宽松货币政策(QE2)结束不足两周,美联储主席便在7月14日亟不可待地表示可能推出QE3。这使得刚趋平静的市场再起涟漪,美国债券市场发展走势遭到质疑。     

美国量化宽松货币政策对我国宏观经济的影响

美联储在2012年12月12日宣布推出第四轮量化宽松(QE4),QE3的冲击还未结束,QE4又再次推出,其对我国宏观经济的影响备受关注。本文从引导经济上行预期、缓解财政悬崖、货币政策"去独立性"和全球流动性释放四个方面阐释了美联储量化宽松货币政策的溢出效应,从货币政策调整压力、出口贸易冲击、资本流动不确定性、输入型通货膨胀、资本市场风险投资、外汇贷款波动、大宗商品及房地产价格上涨、美元储备缩水八个方面分析了美联储量化宽松货币政策对我国宏观经济的影响,并提出了我国的应对之策。     

新一轮量化宽松政策的冲击与应对

QE3的推出有可能加剧全球流动性过剩与新兴市场国家资本流入压力,同时也加剧了未来美联储通过"退出策略"回收流动性的挑战2012年9月14日,美联储终于宣布实施第三轮量化宽松政策(QE3)。美联储将以每月0400亿美元的规模购入机构按揭证券(MBS)。在今年年底扭转操作到期之     

QE3对中国经济的影响与冲击

我们要密切关注由美国货币体系释放出流动性会流向哪里。这是QE3对中国经济影响到底有多大的最为关键问题所在美联储结束了两天议息会议,伯南克(Ben Bernanke)9月14日凌晨宣布推出市场十分期待的第三轮量化宽松政策(即QE3)。QE3的内容主要有,每月购买400亿美元按揭担保证券(MBS),直至就业明显改善为止,同时将超低利率延长至2015年中。可以说,QE3可谓是半开放的改良版,只订下每天购买MBS金额,而没有列明购债券时限与上限。     

QE3风波下美债遭质疑

美国第二轮量化宽松货币政策（QE2）结束不足两周，美联储主席便在7月14日亟不可待地表示可能推出QE3。这使得刚趋平静的市场再起涟漪，美国债券市场发展走势遭到质疑。 隐性量化宽松政策 当前，美国推出的两轮量化宽松政策饱受诟病。特别是QE2后，全球通胀压力骤增，新兴经济体正面临复苏稳定与通货膨胀压力增大的双压态势，因此美国继续推出QE3的可能性并不大。但如果既不能再令债务成数倍增长，也不能再印刷那么多美元，     

QE3:蓄势待发

步入2011年下半年,有关美联储是否会推出第三轮量化宽松货币政策(QE3)的讨论骤然升温。这主要基于三大形势的巨变:一是美国国会两党关于债务上限的谈判僵持不下,并最终成为标普公司下调美国AAA主权评级一个重要原因,金融市场信心遭受重创;二是美国经济上半年意外地疲软,特别是第一季度增长率被下调至几乎停滞的0.4%,而6、7月份则失业率反弹;三是欧洲主权债务危机进一步蔓延,可能最终引发全球经济二次探底。然而,在8月9日美联储议息会议上,美联储并未如期推出QE3,只是承诺至少在2013     

非常规货币政策操作的常态化

短时期,QE3将有利于避免美国经济下行的风险;长期而言,美联储再次启动非常规量化宽松货币政策将引发新一轮的全球流动性盛宴鉴于美国及其货币政策在全球经济中的重要地位,美国QE3(第三轮量化宽松货币政策)的推出将对全球经济金融产生深远的影响。欧美日发达经济体纷纷推出新一轮量化     

QE3：对世界意味着什么

2012年9月13日．美国联邦储备委员会宣布,推出第三轮量化宽松政策（QE3）：QE3震动了伞球,国际大宗商品市场和国际金融市场迅速做出反应．国际财经论坛和各国经济学界立即展开争论。整个世界都在关注。美联储为什么在此时推出QE3？QE3的实际规模究竟有多大？QE3究竟是政治权衡还是经济考量？QE3将会对世界经济和金融市场带来什么影响？本文试分析这些问题。     

经济数据持续良好 金银价格纷纷下跌——2012年10月贵金属走势简析

美国经济数据利好“QE3”加大规模的可能性减小 2012年9月13日,美联储宣布实行第三轮量化宽松的货币政策。该政策的推出,在当时刺激了贵金属价格大幅上涨。然而与前几次量化宽松不同的是,“QE3”的规模是“开放式”的,每月MBS的购买规模和施行时间均与美国的经济数据进行挂钩。对于投资者来说,     

Financial crisis,US unconventional monetary policy and international spillovers

We study the impact of US quantitative easing (QE) on both the emerging and advanced economies, estimating a global vector error-correction model (GVECM). We focus on the effects of reductions in the US term and corporate spreads. The estimated effects of QE are sizeable and vary across economies. First, we find the QE impact from reducing the US corporate spread to be more important than that from lowering the US term spread, consistent with Blinder's (2012) argument. Second, counterfactual exercises suggest that successive US QE measures might have prevented episodes of prolonged recession and deflation in the advanced economies. Third, the estimated effects on the emerging economies are diverse but generally larger than those found for the United States and other advanced economies. The estimates suggest that US monetary policy spillovers contributed to the overheating in Brazil, China and some other emerging economies in 2010 and 2011, but supported their respective recoveries in 2009 and 2012. These heterogeneous effects point to unevenly distributed benefits and costs of cross-border monetary policy spillovers.     

美联储量化宽松货币政策退出对我国跨境资金流动的影响分析

本文在回顾美国历次量化宽松货币政策的实施情况及未来可能的退出步骤的基础上,研究发现我国外汇资金净流入受美国量化宽松货币政策影响较大。针对美联储量化宽松货币政策退出产生的影响,本文提出了相关政策建议。     

2012年主要经济体经济形势和货币政策走势分析

该文分析展望了2012年主要经济体经济形势和货币政策走势,指出主要发达国家将继续实施“超紧”财政政策与“极松”货币政策组合;美国经济复苏进程加快,其货币政策将维持宽松;欧央行可能于上半年再度降息;英国经济不会陷人二次衰退,其量化宽松政策将止步于QE3;国际资本流动将呈回升趋势;外汇市场延续“美元震荡走高、欧元小幅走弱”格局。     

新一轮量化宽松对中国涉外经济的影响

文章梳理了美国历次OE对美国实体经济、美元和全球避险情绪的影响,比较了新一轮OE与前两次0E所面临的不同宏观经济环境,指出QE对美国实体经济的作用相对有限、推出OE也有将其作为应对财政悬崖预防性措施之考虑,文章最后分析了新一轮0E政策对我国涉外经济产生的影响,具体可能表现为进出口顺差减少、资金流入扩大、引起通胀压力、宏观调控难度增加等。     

Unconventional monetary policy and the spillovers to emerging markets

Unconventional monetary policy such as Quantitative Easing (QE) is often considered to have considerable spillover effects on emerging market economies (EME). Aims at quantifying these effects so far mostly use high-frequency data around announcement dates, panels or VAR models. This paper proposes an alternative way to estimate the effects of QE on emerging markets that allows us to include macroeconomic, i.e. low-frequency, data together with announcement dates. A Qual VAR is estimated that integrates binary information of QE announcements with an otherwise standard VAR, including US and emerging market variables. A key advantage is that the model accounts for the endogeneity and forecastability of QE announcements. The model uncovers the Fed's latent, unobservable propensity for QE and generates impulse responses for EME variables to QE shocks. The results suggest that QE has significant effects on EME's financial conditions and plays a sizable role in explaining capital inflows, equity prices and exchange rates.     

Capital Flows During Quantitative Easing: Experiences of Developing Countries

A potentially important side effect of quantitative easing (QE) by the United States Federal Reserve was the expansion of capital flows into developing countries. As a result, there were widespread concerns that reversing QE might trigger financial instability in those countries. The central objective of our article is to empirically investigate this important issue by (1) examining the effect of QE on capital flows into developing Asia and (2) identifying the most significant factors that influence the effect of a QE taper tantrum on exchange rate instability. We find that capital flows into developing countries during QE were at least comparable to those before the global financial crisis. We also find that capital flows during QE and the symptoms of those capital flows such as high inflation, credit expansion, and the deterioration of the current-account balance accounted for much of the destabilizing effect of a QE taper tantrum. While there is no evidence that macroprudential policies directly reduce the destabilizing effect, they can nevertheless be useful preemptive measures.     

外资股权、外币资产负债结构对我国银行稳定性影响的研究

目前,国际资本流动影响我国银行稳定性主要通过两条路径：一是通过持有我国商业银行股权,二是通过改变商业银行的资产负债结构。本文运用15家股份制商业银行2006—2012年面板数据,从微观角度探讨了外资股权结构、外币资产负债结构对其稳定性造成的影响。实证结果表明：（1）外资股权对商业银行稳定性影响在不同银行之间存在着一定差异;（2）外币资产负债结构对于我国商业银行稳定性有明显影响。据此,本文从外资股权、外币资产负债结构方面提出了商业银行稳定性管理的建议。     

Essential concepts necessary to consider when evaluating the efficacy of quantitative easing

The economic impact from quantitative easing (QE) may be much less than assumed by the Federal Reserve. One focus is on the effectiveness of QE to stabilize a failing banking system, and the judgment here is largely positive. A second focus, especially in the US, is on evaluating subsequent rounds of QE that were implemented after the economy had resumed growth and after the banking sector had recapitalized and returned to profitability. For these subsequent rounds of QE, the reviews are decidedly mixed and heavily dependent on the assumptions embedded in the economic models used by the researchers. Researchers willing to assume that the US is a closed domestic economy tend to find a large impact on long-term interest rates from QE. If the US is part of a highly integrated global economy, a smaller effect is presumed. Then there is the more important and controversial evaluation of whether there is any impact on real GDP growth and job creation from QE once the economy is growing again, even if unemployment rates remain historically elevated. What one chooses to ignore or assume does not exist can be more important to the conclusions of QE evaluations than may meet the eye. Inappropriate assumptions can lead to poor decisions.     

人民币汇率预期对经常项下跨境资金流动的影响

本文利用2006-2012年月度时间序列数据．对人民币汇率预期与经常项下跨境资金流动的关系进行了实证研究。结果表明,山东省经常项下跨境资金流动与人民币汇率预期之间存在着协整关系,人民币升值（贬值）预期能够导致跨境资金的大幅流人（流出）。通过对样本企业调查发现．汇率预期在微观角度上影响着跨境资金流动机制的形成。最后,本文对完善人民币汇率预期管理提出了政策建议。     

The effectiveness of the Fed’s quantitative easing policy: New evidence based on international interest rate differentials

This paper explores the effects of non-standard monetary policies on international yield relationships. We first document that long-term rates followed a common global downward trend that had already manifested itself prior to the financial crisis. The bond-buying operations (commonly dubbed Quantitative Easing (QE)) of the US Federal Reserve did not disturb this global co-movement – i.e. the global downward trend in interest rates. We model the relationship between USD and euro (riskless) long-term interest rates using a Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Model (CVAR) employing recursive estimation methods. We find no evidence that QE1 (or the QE episodes) destabilized the transatlantic interest-rate relationship, nor the relationship between interest rates and the US dollar exchange rate. A robustness test using a Vector Autoregressive Model (VAR) with interest rates, inflation rates and output differentials for 11 countries (relative to US) yielded the same result. There is thus little evidence that central bank bond-buying in the US had an independent, distinct impact on US interest rates.