上市公司股票流动性影响因素的作用机制分析

通过对金融市场和金融资产流动性的理论进行回顾和研究,影响上市公司股票流动性的因素具体分为外生因素变量和内生因素变量,进一步分析这些因素对上市公司股票流动性的作用机制,有助于机构或个人投资者对证券资产流动性的认识和对流动性风险的管理.     

Analysis on Balance Gap between Saving and Credit Account in China

In China, the balance gap of credit and saving account emerged in 1995, and its amount enlarged since then. By the end of Dec. 2005, with 28.7 trillion RMB saving balance and 19.5 trillion RMB gross credit account balance, the gap between saving and credit account was as large as 9.2 trillion RMB, which indicated a 67.8% of credit/saving ratio. Some believed this phenomenon was resulted from on one hand, the rapid growth of saving account; and on the other hand, relatively slower expanding of credit account. Some believed cooling down cash demand was behind the gap, while others claimed the balance gap caused dead capital and inefficiency service of saving account. In fact, the balance gap between credit and saving account might not necessarily relate to dead bank capital. And the phenomenon itself could not indicate the down-tendency of finance power that underlay economy. Nevertheless, it was liquidity not the balance gap should be regarded an index of capital situation in financial organizations. Therefore the balance gap between saving account and credit account could not be viewed as criteria against liquidity position. Solution of this problem should lay in boosting financial innovation among commercial banks, expending capital market and encouraging or permitting commercial banks as well as state-owed funds to enter share market and so on.     

商业银行流动性过剩的危害及其解决对策

银行流动性过剩加大了商业银行的竞争风险，增加了商业银行战略转型的难度，已成为当前金融运行中的突出问题。因此，央行应灵活运用各种货币政策工具加大政府投资力度，大力发展资本市场，拓展新的存贷款业务，创新金融产品，解决流动性过剩问题。     

农业企业流动资金短缺成因及其改善研究

如何有效解决流动资金短缺对企业的成长和发展来说具有非常重要的现实意义。本文以认真分析流动资金往复循环的投入和回收,分析流动资金短缺的成因,有针对性地提出流动资金短缺时制约企业发展和经济效益提高的对策措施。     

我国商业银行流动性与外汇储备的协整性分析

以商业银行流动性和外汇储备之间的关系为研究对象，运用相关计量方法，证明了外汇储备是商业银行流动性的格兰杰原因。国有商业银行流动性过剩在很大程度上源于外汇储备的增长，并且商业银行流动性与外汇储备之间存在着比较稳定的长期均衡关系。     

Liquidity and Optimal Market Transparency

In this paper I explore some of the consequences of greater market transparency for market performance in the presence of a strategic specialist. Although numerous studies have dealt with this issue, previous work has only considered either fully transparent or fully opaque markets. My model allows for different levels of transparency, and therefore sheds light on how transparency affects market performance. I show that an intermediate level of transparency can improve market performance relative to the more extreme cases of full transparency or no transparency at all.     

对人民币汇率和通货膨胀的思考

2005年7月汇改后,人民币汇率兑美元呈现加速升值的走势。与此同时,国内居民消费价格指数(CPI)上扬,人民币国内购买力呈贬值态势。物价的上涨使大多数劳动者无法从人民币汇率升值中受益,也将使人民币兑美元升值现象难以持久。本文认为在当前人民币兑美元汇率仍存在升值预期下应未雨绸缪,积极疏导流动性过剩,稳定物价水平。     

商业银行主动负债发展的经济效应

主动负债发展会带来商业银行间融资增加,通过分别设立模型研究商业银行间净融资规模增加和不同期限互相融资规模增加两种情况后,可以得出主动负债发展的微观经济效应:(1)净融资规模增加后银行流动性改善,资金投放规模增加;融资环境改善后商业银行备付金率可降低,流动性进一步提高.(2)商业银行彼此融资后,在不同期限资金投放业务上成本不同的银行会发挥各自相对优势,实现差异化经营,促使银行总收益增加.在上述微观分析基础上,通过对我国金融环境的具体分析,可以得出主动负债发展能推动我国利率市场化、发展金融市场、促进货币创造等宏观经济效应.     

商业银行流动性危机传染机理研究

银行危机传染往往给一个国家或地区的经济带来巨大的损失.不完全的银行间拆借市场中隐含了更大的银行危机传染的可能性;银行间的长期资产越多,银行间拆借的短期利率和银行间存款的长期利率越高,银行间拆借市场就越稳定,在遭受流动性冲击时,这一市场发生银行危机传染的可能性就越小.适量的银行存款对传染效应具有阻碍作用.为防范系统性风险,中国商业银行应逐步建立完备的银行间存款市场,减少政府干预,让市场约束力来强化商业银行的风险管理意识.     

Liquidity Provision of Limit Order Trading in the Futures Market Under Bull and Bear Markets

Abstract:  This study investigates how limit orders affect liquidity in a purely order-driven futures market. Additionally, the possible asymmetric relationship between market depth and transitory volatility in bull and bear markets and the effect of institutional trading on liquidity provision behavior are examined as well. The empirical results demonstrate that subsequent market depth increases as transient volatility increases in bull markets. Market depth exhibits significantly positive relationship to subsequent transient volatility in bull markets. Additionally, although trading volume positively influences transient volatility in bull markets, no such relationship exists in bear markets. Liquidity provision decreases when institutional trading activity intensifies during bear markets. Thus, liquidity provision for limit orders differs between bull and bear markets.