我国外包理论研究的特征表现——基于中文期刊文献的数据分析

外包作为一种新兴的商业现象，日益引起了国内外学界的关注。采用中文期刊文献定量研究方法，从全局的、历史的视角，探讨总结我国外包研究全局性的演进趋势、外包研究成果著者的群体特征、外包研究成果的学科、载体及研究层次、外包研究的核心方向及路径、外包研究的核心理论基础渊源、外包研究的基金资助特征等。研究结果表明：外包研究既有与其他研究主题相似的特征表现，也具有自己独特的表现。     

基于CNKI文献计量法分析手机在食品领域的应用及发展趋势

研究手机在食品领域的应用现状及其发展趋势,能够为该领域的进一步发展设立基础。本文采用文献计量法,以CNKI数据库为资源并检索,运用SATI、UCINET、Net Draw、Microsoft Excel 2010等工具分别从文献发表的时间、数量、关键词、基金来源、载文期刊、被引次数以及文献内容等多方面进行计量分析。检索共得文献461篇(1998年1月1日—2019年12月31日),分刊于39种刊物,其中有7项资助基金,有41所机构参与研究,共检得专利148项,内容主要集中于手机在食品领域的基础应用和检测应用两大主题。早期国内研究方向单一、内容浅显,但近年来研究热度升温,内容涉及食品信息溯源、管理和食品安全检测等多个方面,重点日趋多样化,在智能检测上取得了技术性及创新性的突破,但在产学研结合等方面还需举步直追。     

高等职业教育服务区域经济发展研究的文献计量学分析

对收录在中国期刊网上的224条高等职业教育服务区域经济发展研究文章题录（1990-2014年）进行文献计量学分析,结果表明：1.关于高等职业教育服务区域经济发展研究论文数量不多;2.发表的期刊比较广泛,教育学类期刊是刊载论文的主要载体;3.研究力量机构不均衡,主要集中在高职院校;4.研究地域分布不均衡,主要集中在经济较发达的地区;5.项目资助有限,有待加大资助的力度;6.论文以独撰为主,合作研究较少;7.研究内容主要集中在对策研究,二者相互关系、影响因素及运行机制研究较少。     

吸入给药的文献计量学及可视化分析

为分析吸入给药的研究热点、前沿动态和发展趋势,通过CiteSpace软件对Web of Science数据库中2011—2020年吸入给药的相关文献进行研究,根据国家、机构之间的合作网络,关键词共现网络以及文献、期刊之间的共被引网络研究分析结果,共检索到相关文献2 580篇。结果显示:1)近10年来吸入给药领域相关文献的年均发文量基本逐年递增,说明研究学者们对此领域的关注度有所提高。发文量较多的国家为美国、中国、日本,高产机构为悉尼大学、冈山大学等,发表和引文数最多的期刊为《AM J RESP CRIT CARE》和《NEW ENGL J MED》;2)关键词分析和被引文献分析结果显示哮喘、呼吸窘迫综合征、囊性纤维化、阻塞性肺炎、急性肺损伤等相关疾病及其吸入制剂的研发在该领域处于研究热点,有害物质的暴露与吸入之间的关系是近10年的研究前沿。该研究的分析结果为指导吸入制剂的深入研发与肺部疾病的治疗提供了借鉴意义。     

Behavioral Finance in Brazil: A Bibliometric Study from 2007 to 2017

This article analyzed 58 Brazilian journals in order to address the gap unexplored in the past 10?years by congresses and periodical journals. In this research, an analysis based on keywords was used, followed by analysis of citations and co-citations that allowed to verify: an average growth of 20% p.a. of publications; the most common focus was replication of Kahneman and Tversky; the most studied group tended to be university students; quality has failed to accompany the increase in publications; public institutions publish more. A gap was perceived in the surveying of financial managers and investors, as well as bias and heuristics as a subject.     

A quantitative turn in the historiography of economics?

ABSTRACT

Quantitative approaches are not yet common among historians and methodologists of economics, although they are in the study of science by librarians, information scientists, sociologists, historians, and even economists. The main purpose of this essay is to reflect methodologically on the historiography of economics: is it witnessing a quantitative turn? Is such a turn desirable? We answer the first question by pointing out a ‘methodological moment’, in general, and a noticeable rise of quantitative studies among historians of economics during the past few years. To the second question, all contributors to this special issue bring relatively optimistic answers by highlighting the benefits of using quantitative methodologies as complements to the more traditional meta-analyses of both historians and methodologists of economics.     

Five reasons for the use of network analysis in the history of economics

ABSTRACT

Network analysis is increasingly appreciated as a methodology in the social sciences. In recent years, it is also receiving attention among historians of science. History of economics is no exception in that researchers have begun to use network analysis to study a variety of topics, including collaborations and interactions in scientific communities, the spread of economic theories within and across fields, or the formation of new specialties in the discipline of economics. Against this backdrop, a debate is emerging about how network analysis can help address questions that are pertinent to the history of economics. With this paper, we want to push this debate one step forward by offering and discussing five reasons why network analysis should have a future in the history of economics.     

Quantifying central banks’ scientization: why and how to do a quantified organizational history of economics

ABSTRACT

A subset of research in the history of economics is organizational history – i.e. the study of the organizations producing, circulating and applying economic ideas. This article maintains that some research questions in organizational history call for quantitative methods because they ask about magnitudes. More precisely, we claim that quantitative methods should complement rather than replace other research methods when the research question is at least partly about magnitudes. We walk the walk with a study of one type of organization, central banks, and of its changing relationship with economic science. Our results point unambiguously toward a growing dominance of central banks in the specialized field of monetary economics. Central banks have swelling research armies, they publish a growing share of the articles in specialized scholarly journals, and these articles tend to have more impact today than the articles produced outside central banks.     

国际创业研究的热点和趋势——基于SSCI的文献计量和知识图谱分析

以Web of Science中SSCI数据库收录的发表于1994—2014年的6398篇创业研究文献为研究样本,运用文献计量法分析了研究论文的时间分布、国家分布和期刊分布,通过对关键词和突发主题词进行共现分析和可视化分析明确研究热点和未来趋势。结果显示:国际创业研究论文数量持续增加;研究热点主要是创业模式、创业绩效、创业环境等;移民创业、学术型创业、创业环境、创业城市和创业机会等是研究前沿。     

National nanotechnology research prominence

A new bibliometric technique enables one to distinguish high emergence topical content. This technique can be applied to sets of research publication abstracts reflecting a given technical domain (here, nanotechnology) to score cutting edge research terms. The resulting high emergence terms warrant special consideration in setting R&D priorities. The researchers (individuals, organizations, or countries) whose publications address those emergent terms heavily deserve consideration as possible leaders in that technical domain. This paper studies nanotechnology research publications using the new emergence scoring in conjunction with established bibliometric publication and citation measures. Findings challenge U.S. superiority in cutting edge nanotechnology research. China shows strongest at addressing emergent nanotechnology topics, followed by the U.S., South Korea, India, and, surprisingly, Iran.