排序方式: 共有3条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
Corporate Ownership Around the World 总被引:230,自引:0,他引:230
Rafael La Porta Florencio Lopez-De-Silanes & Andrei Shleifer 《The Journal of Finance》1999,54(2):471-517
We use data on ownership structures of large corporations in 27 wealthy economies to identify the ultimate controlling shareholders of these firms. We find that, except in economies with very good shareholder protection, relatively few of these firms are widely held, in contrast to Berle and Means's image of ownership of the modern corporation. Rather, these firms are typically controlled by families or the State. Equity control by financial institutions is far less common. The controlling shareholders typically have power over firms significantly in excess of their cash flow rights, primarily through the use of pyramids and participation in management. 相似文献
2.
Investor Protection and Corporate Valuation 总被引:127,自引:0,他引:127
Rafael La porta Florencio Lopez-De-Silanes rei Shleifer & Robert Vishny 《The Journal of Finance》2002,57(3):1147-1170
We present a model of the effects of legal protection of minority shareholders and of cash-flow ownership by a controlling shareholder on the valuation of firms. We then test this model using a sample of 539 large firms from 27 wealthy economies. Consistent with the model, we find evidence of higher valuation of firms in countries with better protection of minority shareholders and in firms with higher cash-flow ownership by the controlling shareholder. 相似文献
3.
Government Ownership of Banks 总被引:33,自引:0,他引:33
Rafael La Porta Florencio Lopez-De-Silanes & Andrei Shleifer 《The Journal of Finance》2002,57(1):265-301
We assemble data on government ownership of banks around the world. The data show that such ownership is large and pervasive, and higher in countries with low levels of per capita income, backward financial systems, interventionist and inefficient governments, and poor protection of property rights. Higher government ownership of banks in 1970 is associated with slower subsequent financial development and lower growth of per capita income and productivity. This evidence supports "political" theories of the effects of government ownership of firms. 相似文献
1