高管薪酬契约、风险控制与企业绩效--中国上市银行的实证分析

基于代理理论和制度理论的视角,运用2008—2013年中国上市银行的数据对风险控制、企业绩效和高管薪酬之间的关系进行了实证检验。结果表明：不同性质的上市银行高管薪酬具有显著差异;企业绩效对高管薪酬有正向影响,中国上市银行已经建立起基于业绩的高管薪酬制度;风险控制对高管薪酬有正向影响,中国上市银行的高管薪酬与风险成本调整后的绩效相适应。     

上市银行高管-员工薪酬差距对公司绩效影响的实证研究

金融业高管天价薪酬成为近年来的焦点话题之一,本文利用2010~2014年上市银行的数据,对高管-员工薪酬差距影响绩效进行了实证研究。研究得出,高管-员工酬差距与绩效存在着区间效应,也验证了上市银行薪酬差距对绩效的影响是锦标赛理论与社会比较理论综合作用的结果,提出了要充分发挥薪酬激励竞争性与公平性作用的建议。     

我国上市银行高管薪酬和经营绩效相关性研究

近年来,上市银行高管薪酬成为社会关注的热点.本文运用我国5家上市商业银行2001～2007年年报披露的有关数据,分析了高管薪酬与企业经营绩效的关系.实证研究表明,这5家银行的高管薪酬与商业银行的盈利性水平呈显著正相关,总资产正向影响高管薪酬,但是高管薪酬与商业银行经营的安全性和流动性相关程度不高,与不良资产率的相关性不显著.商业银行的绩效变量只能解释高管薪酬30%左右的变化,这说明当前上市银行高管薪酬的决定机制中还没有充分考虑银行的综合经营绩效.因此,为了充分发挥薪酬的激励作用,应建立能充分考虑银行综合经营绩效的高管薪酬决定机制.     

银行董事会特征、CEO报酬与银行绩效——基于对11家股份制银行的数据分析

本文通过采集2005～2008年11家已上市的全国股份制商业银行的数据,实证分析了银行董事会独立性与CEO报酬之间的关系,并在考虑银行CEO报酬内生性基础上,进一步检验了银行董事会独立性、CEO报酬和银行绩效的关系。研究结果显示:长任期的CEO、CEO兼任董事长、较大比例的内部董事和较大的董事会规模构成了中国上市银行的监管障碍。银行CEO的高薪酬是不足为奇的,因为高薪酬对应的是银行业绩的显著增长。CEO报酬是银行公司治理的强化机制,授予银行CEO合理的激励报酬可以克服银行监管障碍,提高银行治理水平。     

银行高管薪酬与货币政策信贷传导效率--基于中国数据的分析北大核心CSSCISSCI

从风险承担激励的角度看,银行高管薪酬是影响货币政策银行贷款传导渠道效率的重要因素。本文利用中国16家上市银行2002-2012年的季度数据,使用面板模型,对高薪酬银行和低薪酬银行贷款供给对货币政策的反应进行了实证研究。结果表明,货币政策对高薪酬银行贷款供给的影响程度高于对低薪银行的影响程度,高管薪酬在银行贷款渠道中发挥着重要作用。这一结论对金融监管政策和货币政策间的关系具有重要的含义。     

商业银行高管薪酬业绩敏感度的实证研究

本文基于调查数据,实证分析了银行绩效对高管薪酬的影响,并对银行高管薪酬绩效敏感度的影响因素进行了分析。结果发现,样本银行高管薪酬与银行绩效之间显著负相关,股权集中、银行风险和银行规模也影响了银行高管薪酬的决定;股权集中和银行风险强化了银行高管薪酬与绩效之间的敏感度,而股权制衡则弱化了薪酬绩效敏感度。     

商业银行高管薪酬业绩敏感度的实证研究

本文基于调查数据,实证分析了银行绩效对高管薪酬的影响,并对银行高管薪酬绩效敏感度的影响因素进行了分析.结果发现,样本银行高管薪酬与银行绩效之间显著负相关,股权集中、银行风险和银行规模也影响了银行高管薪酬的决定;股权集中和银行风险强化了银行高管薪酬与绩效之间的敏感度,而股权制衡则弱化了薪酬绩效敏感度.     

薪酬管制对国有上市银行高管薪酬及与员工薪酬差距影响研究

以2006—2013年国有控股上市银行为样本,研究分析我国出台高管薪酬管制政策后,对国有上市银行高管薪酬以及高管与员工薪酬差距的影响。发现：薪酬管制政策对国有银行高管“限薪”效应不显著,但对高管薪酬结构和发放机制产生了影响。（2）国有银行高管薪酬远低于民营银行。（3）高管与员工薪酬绝对差距依然较大,薪酬管制没有达到预期政策效果;两者之间相对差距在薪酬管制政策后逐渐缩小。     

薪酬管制对国有上市银行高管薪酬影响研究

本文以2006~2013年国有控股上市银行为样本,研究分析我国出台高管薪酬管制政策后,对国有上市银行高管薪酬以及高管与员工薪酬差距的影响。研究发现:薪酬管制政策对国有银行高管"限薪"效应不显著,但对高管薪酬结构和发放机制产生了影响,国有银行高管薪酬远低于民营银行。高管与员工薪酬绝对差距依然较大,薪酬管制没有达到预期政策效果,两者之间相对差距在薪酬管制政策后逐渐缩小。以上研究,为我国合理评估政府薪酬管制和市场化改革等政策,进一步改革国有银行高管薪酬制度,科学制定高管薪酬机制和有效缩小高管与员工的薪酬差距提供了经验数据。     

上市银行高管过度激励与风险承担水平的实证研究

本文基于我国14家上市银行2007-2013年的数据,通过考察不同性质银行的高管所面临的过度激励与风险承担之间的关系,检验了我国商业银行高管薪酬激励机制的有效性.实证结果表明:第一,我国上市商业银行高管薪酬存在过度激励,且过度激励会造成银行风险承担水平的提高.第二,不同性质银行高管的过度激励对风险承担水平的影响是不同的.国有控股银行高管若受到过度激励,有可能会盲目扩大经营规模,增加银行的经营风险;而非国有控股银行的高管相对而言,这种激励作用会较弱.为此,要进一步推进商业银行高管薪酬改革,防止过度激励.尤其是国有控股银行高管薪酬机制设计要更加关注风险因素.     

Corporate Governance and Mergers and Acquisitions Performance in Banks: Evidence under the Special Regulatory Environment in Taiwan

In this study, we focus on the relation between bank governance and bank merger results under Taiwan’s special regulatory environment in 2000. Adopting governance variables (executive remuneration, managerial ownership, and board diversity), we find that managerial ownership is positively related to bank merger results and that board size is negatively correlated with bank mergers’ performance. This study supports sound governance mechanisms to prevent banks from pursuing a value-loss merger and acquisition (M&A). Our results offer the insight that internal bank governance structures have a bigger impact on the value effects from bank mergers. Thus, regulators may elevate the performance of bank M&As by enhancing corporate governance codes.     

Macroeconomic Impact of Bank Regulation and Supervision: A Cross-Country Investigation

Bank regulation and supervision (RS) is a formal institutional mechanism that aims to reduce the adverse selection and moral hazard risks in the banking sector. This paper offers an empirical exploration of the relationship between banking-sector performance and RS using data on the legal quality of bank regulation and supervision. The main channels via which RS affects bank performance are considered to be depositor trust, investment mobilization, and borrower discipline. An event study of up to fifty-three countries provides robust evidence that RS has significant positive effects on bank deposits and investment rate and significant negative effects on nonperforming loans.     

Executive performance-based remuneration, performance change and board structures

This paper examines CEO performance-based remuneration in companies that experience improvement in financial performance but have different board structures. It analyzes how such payment relates to change in financial performance and board structures by comparing the cases between Australian and Singaporean companies. The results highlight that performance pay in both countries is likely to be linked to change in performance. However, the proportion of CEO performance-based payment in both countries does not seem to be related to board structure. Larger firms in both countries appear to make great use of performance-based remuneration. Sales revenue is likely to be used by companies in both countries as a yardstick for determining CEO performance pay.     

Bank Growth Choices and Changes in Market Performance

Changes in bank market performance are compared for banks that choose not to grow, to branch, bank acquire, product expand, or some combination. Using the change in market value‐to‐book value ratios, banks that include acquiring other banks as part of their growth strategy have significant positive changes in performance. Positive performance by bank acquirers is in contrast to many studies, but prior research has not reviewed other growth activities in a single model, nor used market‐based measures to review performance over longer time periods following bank expansion.     

Managerial Incentives and the Choice between Public and Bank Debt

I propose a simple model with complete and perfect information on the relation between managerial incentive compensation and choice between public and bank debt. The empirical analysis offers considerable support to the model's predictions. I find that managers whose compensation is tied to firm performance prefer bank to public debt. Further, I find a positive relation between cost of public debt and managerial incentive compensation and no relation between loan spreads and incentive compensation. Finally, I find that banks are more likely to include a collateral provision in the debt contract if the CEO's compensation is tied to firm performance.     

The Impact of Capital Requirements and Managerial Compensation on Bank Charter Value

This paper examines the joint impact of capital requirements and managerial incentive compensation on bank charter value and bank risk. Most of the previous literature in the area of banking and agency theory has focused on asymmetric information between either banks and regulators, (and therefore on the role of bank capital), or between bank shareholders and bank managers, (and therefore on the role of managerial ownership). In this paper we unify these issues and present empirical results from the regression of capital requirements jointly with measures of incentive compensation on Tobin's Q, our proxy for bank charter value, and on the standard deviation of total return, our proxy for bank risk. In a sample of 102 bank holding companies we find that capital levels are consistently a significant positive factor in determining bank charter value and a significant negative factor in determining risk. On the other hand, we find our six measures of incentive compensation to be generally insignificant relative to charter value but do provide some evidence consistent with a theory relating types of incentive compensation with risk.     

Executive Remuneration and Corporate Divestment: Motivating Managers to Make Unpalatable Decisions

Abstract:  This study examines the impact of voluntary divestment on executive remuneration, using an unbalanced panel of 107 UK quoted companies over the period 1988 to 1993. It employs a dynamic compensation equation, with a vector of controls and alternative specifications of the divestment effect. The results show no general direct evidence of a remuneration process that rewards managers for downsizing their firms. Indeed the substantial pay-size elasticity implies the reverse. However, divestment does have a positive and significant effect in raising executive remuneration under a regime of strong corporate governance, defined in terms of the presence of a substantial blockholder.     

THE GOVERNANCE OF CEO INCENTIVES IN ENGLISH NHS HOSPITAL TRUSTS

Institutional arrangements for the governance of CEO pay and turnover in English NHS Hospital Trusts replicate best practice for listed companies but with the additional feature of centrally imposed performance measurement. In this paper we investigate the impact of this unique combination of incentives on the relationship between CEO pay/turnover and Trust financial and operating performance in the period 1998–2005. We identify a strong association between poor Trust performance and CEO turnover but find little evidence that remuneration committees relate pay to performance in the best performing Trusts. Our findings raise questions about the economic rationale for remuneration committees in the governance of NHS Hospital Trusts.     

中小银行战略联盟创新绩效研究——基于激励协同视角的解释

通过运用 SEM模型,从激励协同视角系统分析中小银行战略联盟创新绩效的影响因素,结果发现:激励协同对战略联盟创新绩效有直接正向影响;激励协同通过促进不同层次知识主体的知识转移和知识共享进而对战略联盟创新绩效产生间接正向影响;激励协同序参量对战略联盟创新绩效及不同层次知识主体知识转移、知识共享均有促进作用.     

商业银行运营效率与董事会治理

本文在对中国16家上市商业银行绩效进行前沿效率分析的基础上,建立以董事会规模、外部董事监事占比、CEO薪酬和管理层人均薪酬为基础的二元选择模型,对中国商业银行运营效率同董事会治理的关系进行了实证研究。结果表明,独立董事在商业银行公司治理中的作用并不明显,CEO薪酬和董事会规模对商业银行业绩并无显著影响,董事会规模过大无...