创业团队成员相同价值观会带来绩效提高吗？

价值观是个体对事物的道德评价标准,不同价值观决定了差异化的行为选择。从价值观结构视角出发,探讨了创业团队成员不同类型价值观一致性对创业绩效的作用机理及股权配置公平对两者关系的调节作用。采用层级回归方法对175个创业团队样本进行实证研究,结果显示：创业团队成员的自我超越价值观一致性、开放价值观一致性正向影响创业绩效;自我提高价值观一致性、保守价值观一致性不利于创业绩效提升;股权配置公平对自我超越价值观一致性、开放价值观一致性与创业绩效之间的关系具有正向调节作用,弱化自我提高价值观一致性与创业绩效的负向关系,但对保守价值观一致性与创业绩效关系的负向调节作用并不显著。     

员工差错取向对创新行为的影响机制研究

员工创新性活动不可避免地伴随着差错风险,组织成员对待差错的心理与行为倾向决定员工后续创新活动发展方向。结合中国情景,采用问卷调查法获取231份企事业单位的有效样本数据,基于差错反感文化视角,深入探究差错取向影响员工创新行为的内在机理。结果表明：差错取向正向影响员工创新行为;创新自我效能感在差错取向与员工创新行为间起部分中介作用;差错反感文化负向调节差错取向与员工创新行为间的关系。     

工作报告模式的地方政府绩效自评估分析——以省级政府工作报告为例

中国地方政府的工作报告制度承担着绩效自评估的重要功能。通过对省级政府工作报告的产生过程和文本内容的分析发现,这种模式的绩效自评估在方式、内容和结果上分别存在操作过程的封闭性、指标构成的选择性和文本表达的策略性问题,从而影响绩效自评估的实际效果。要充分实现这种绩效自评估的制度功能,需要形成多方监督的操作方式、设置科学合理的指标体系、规定完整准确的文本呈现并加强其法制化。     

竞争氛围感知对员工知识隐藏行为的影响机制

知识隐藏是知识管理领域的前沿主题。尽管已有研究探讨了知识隐藏的影响因素,但从组织情境视角探究员工知识隐藏影响因素的研究并不多。鉴于此,基于情感事件理论,探讨竞争氛围感知对员工知识隐藏的影响机制,尤其是消极情绪的中介作用以及员工竞争特质、公众自我觉知的调节作用。结果表明：①竞争氛围感知对员工知识隐藏具有积极影响,员工消极情绪在其中发挥部分中介作用;②员工竞争特质对竞争氛围感知与员工消极情绪关系存在调节作用;③员工的公众自我觉知在消极情绪与知识隐藏关系中发挥调节效应;④员工竞争特质和公众自我觉知共同调节消极情绪对竞争氛围感知与知识隐藏关系的中介作用,即当员工的竞争特质和公众自我觉知同时较低时,该中介作用更强,反之更弱。     

创新奖励与员工创造力角色认同关系研究

基于社会认知理论探讨创新奖励与创造力角色认同关系,验证创造力自我效能感的中介作用,同时,辨析结果公平感知对该关系的调节作用。结果表明,创新奖励对创造力角色认同具有显著正向影响,创造力自我效能感在创新奖励与创造力角色认同之间起部分中介作用,结果公平感知在创新奖励与创造力自我效能感之间起调节作用。最后,探讨了研究的管理意义以及未来研究方向。     

自信的员工更有创造力吗

基于创造力交互作用观,从内在动机角度分析核心自我评价通过和谐型激情对创造力的作用机制及相应的情境机制。对某制造企业11个事业部员工样本数据分析发现：核心自我评价显著正向影响员工创造力;核心自我评价与和谐型激情、和谐型激情与创造力均存在显著正相关关系;和谐型激情在核心自我评价影响创造力的过程中起中介作用,并受到团队成员交换关系的调节。     

机构持股、公司治理与上市公司R&D投入——来自中国上市公司的经验证据

基于代理理论,检验了机构投资者能否作为一种公司治理机制,降低管理层的代理成本,激励上市公司管理层增加R&D投入、追求上市公司的长期价值。结论显示,机构持股与上市公司R&D支出之间存在显著正相关关系,机构持股能够激励企业进行长期投资。以上发现表明,机构投资者已经能够作为一种公司治理的机制参与到公司治理中,并对公司的经营运作发挥监督作用。     

The appreciative democratic voice of DEA: A case of faculty academic performance evaluation

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is in fact more than just being an instrument for measuring the relative efficiencies of a group of decision making units (DMU). DEA models are also means of expressing appreciative democratic voices of DMUs. This paper proposes a methodology for allocating premium points to a group of professors using three models sequentially: (1) a DEA model for appreciative academic self-evaluation, (2) a DEA model for appreciative academic cross-evaluation, and (3) a Non-DEA model for academic rating of professors for the purpose of premium allocations. The premium results, called DEA results, are then compared with the premium points “nurtured” by the Dean, called N bonus points. After comparing DEA results and N bonus points, the Dean reassessed his initial bonus points and provided new ones – called DEA-N decisions. The experience indicates that judgmental decisions (Dean's evaluations) can be enhanced by making use of formal models (DEA and Non-DEA models). Moreover, the appreciative and democratic voices of professors are virtually embedded in the DEA models.     

A processual theory of green identity formation: the case of young environmentalists in Australia

Using image‐elicited, depth interviews, this qualitative study explores green consumption practices among 20 young environmentalists, aged between 18 and 25 years, in an Australian city with a view to examine how various identity formations reside in their narratives. The study's findings strongly support the applicability of Cherrier and Murray's four‐stage processual theory of identity (sensitization, separation, socialization, striving) to understand young environmentalist's formation of a green identity. The study also develops an emergent processual theory of green identity formation, which encompasses four main stages of control, create, compromise and customize. Each stage corresponds to how the young environmentalists position and negotiate their formative green identities, including first enacting control about their identity; creating their new identity in relation to existing green identity projects; compromising their new identity as it is practiced and socialized in their lives; and finally, customizing their identity as they frame, situate and align personal, social and cultural influences about consumption and their identity. The findings inform green policy makers and institutions working towards building a green consumer society involving young consumers.     

INDIVIDUAL DETERMINANTS OF SELF‐EMPLOYMENT ENTRY: WHAT DO WE REALLY KNOW?

The analysis of the decision to enter into self‐employment is a hot topic in the economic literature. Among the elements that most directly influence this decision, individual factors are central. This study produces a comprehensive survey of the impact of these factors, covering both the theoretical arguments and the main conclusions emerging from the empirical studies. We analyze 12 critical determinant factors of the entry into self‐employment grouped into seven categories: (1) basic individual characteristics (gender, age, marital status, and children); (2) family background (parents and spouse); (3) personality characteristics; (4) human capital (education and experience); (5) health condition; (6) nationality and ethnicity; and (7) access to financial resources. While for some of the factors solid conclusions can be found, for others additional research is still needed in order to shed further light on their influence.