基于价值链理论的房地产企业核心竞争力提升的研究

形成和提升核心竞争力是房地产企业获得持续发展必须面临和解决的问题。从价值链理论视角出发,房地产企业提升其核心竞争力主要包括：提升对市场的把握能力,即以设计创新提高规划设计能力,以经营创新提高市场营销能力和市场表现力;提升资源整合能力,即以加强企业文化建设、品牌建设和管理制度的创新,提升企业对无形资产以及土地、资金、人力资源和信息资源等有形资产的整合利用能力。     

企业核心竞争力的培育与误区分析

核心竞争力是指在组织内部所形成的一系列知识、技能和经验的结合体,是组织在运用这些结合体时的整合能力。但企业对核心竞争力的认识存在几个误区:认为企业所有的资源都构成核心竞争力、技术的研发能力是核心竞争力、软实力是核心竞争力以及核心竞争力可以在短期内形成等。本文针对核心竞争力的培育,主要从市场能力、战略决策、知识管理、构建学习型组织、信息共享、激励、自我实现的企业文化等几个方面进行了探讨。     

第三方物流与制造企业竞争力分析

本文以制造企业与第三方物流的理论作为基础,并对此作出了理论性的研究,其中第三方物流是工序分配与专业要求下形成的必然产物,它也是生产力不断提升的主要表现。在战略管理理论发展的第三个阶段——核心能力理论中,核心能力理论的衍生性是指利用有效的展现核心能力可以让企业衍生出很多新的事物,使企业得到相关的新业务领域开拓。所以,我们要辨别核能业务与非核能业务,从而节省成本,防止资金流失。因此,本文根据企业核心竞争力理论促进制造企业的核心竞争力体系的形成,并在体现研究、生产制造以及营销方式的同时,指出其物流与制造企业核心能力的体现差异。     

先进制造技术与企业竞争优势——基于企业资源观的述评

本文认为,企业资源观理论为我们研究先进制造技术如何影响和形成企业竞争优势提供了非常好的理论框架.企业在先进制造技术资源的应用方面能够做到差异化,企业的先进制造技术资产对其他有形或无形资产的杠杆作用可以成为形成企业持续竞争力的异质性资源,这些异质性资源的结合还会产生更强的先进制造技术动态能力.要取得有竞争力的先进制造技术资源,需要企业花费大量的时间学习和积累.先进制造技术资源难以模仿和复制,具有社会复杂性,可以成为持续竞争优势的源泉.     

企业集团核心竞争力的构成要素与形成机理

企业集团核心竞争力随着企业集团的发展成熟而产生。企业集团的核心竞争力具有复合性,是对集团内部资源和能力进行整合的结果。其构成要素包括集团公司的技术能力和组织能力,它的形成是多种因素综合作用的复杂过程,受到企业文化、治理结构、管理整合、组织结构、知识和资源的影响。     

企业文化构筑企业核心竞争力

市场经济条件下,企业都在追求树立长期竞争优势,以实现可持续发展。那么,企业持续竞争优势的来源何在?经过研究我们认为,企业持续竞争优势来源于企业所拥有的战略性资源和培育的核心竞争力。其中核心竞争力通常可包括企业的技术能力、管理能力和企业文化,优秀的企业文化构成企业核心竞     

企业文化构筑企业核心竞争力

市场经济条件下，企业都在追求树立长期竞争优势，以实现可持续发展。那么，企业持续竞争优势的来源何在?经过研究我们认为，企业持续竞争优势来源于企业所拥有的战略性资源和培育的核心竞争力。其中核心竞争力通常可包括企业的技术能力、管理能力和企业文化，优秀的企业文化构成企业核心竞争力的重要组成部分。     

论打造基于CIS的企业核心竞争力

全球化和信息经济时代,企业竞争从单一稳定的资源肉搏发展到信息、技术、文化、形象多因素全方位动态比拼。探讨CIS与企业核心竞争力二者关系对企业经营管理活动的变革与发展有深远的理论和现实意义。剖析CIS各层面与核心竞争力的契合关系,揭示CIS的存在和作用方式,为企业审视和打造核心竞争力提供独特的形象视角。     

我国房地产企业塑造核心竞争力的对策

企业核心竞争力是指企业在开发技术、产品和市场营销等方面所具有的系列互补性的知识与技能的有机综合体。是企业有效地配置和利用各种自身可支配资源与要素以期获得长期竞争优势的能力。企业核心竞争力以企业技术能力为核心．通过企业战略决策、生产制造、市场营销以及组织管理能力的整合而使企业获取长期比较竞争优势。     

论职工培训与企业核心竞争力

一、核心竞争力是企业发展的根本能力 关于"核心竞争力"一词,首先是美国经济学家普拉哈拉德和哈默于1990年在<哈佛商业评论>上提出的.此观点一经提出,就得到了学术界和企业界的高度重视.那么,何谓核心竞争力?简单的说就是企业在经营过程中形成的不易被竞争对手效仿的、能带来超额利润的独特的能力;它是企业在生产经营、新产品研发、售后服务等一系列营销过程和各种决策中形成的;具有自己独特优势的技术、文化或机制所决定的巨大的资本能量和经营实力.可以说,核心竞争力是企业所有能力中最重要、最关键、最根本的能力.因此,如何提升企业核心竞争力,便成为了理论界和业界积极探讨和实践的话题.那么究竟怎样做,才能提升企业核心竞争力呢?研究者们纷纷从企业文化、资源、制度、市场和技术等不同层面探悉影响企业核心竞争力的原因;但是,我们看到在诸多的研究中,对提升企业核心竞争力的基础问题的研究却很少,这应该说是研究中的一个不足.那么,什么才是提升企业核心竞争力的基础呢?笔者认为,是企业职工素质.     

制造业企业核心竞争力二元结构维度构建

企业核心竞争力是企业保持持续竞争优势和可持续发展的关键因素,在对现有企业核心竞争力研究归纳分析的基础上,通过对制造业企业核心竞争力的知识创新、企业文化、生产能力、管理能力、营销能力、服务能力和响应能力的分析,提出基于隐性力量支撑维度和显性能力保障维度的二元结构,设计制造业企业核心竞争力二元结构的类原子模型,对其中结构内的协同关系和结构间的协同关系进行阐释,并提出二元结构的运行机理的齿轮模式,以期能够完善制造业企业核心竞争力的研究,促进制造业企业核心竞争力的构建和提升.     

Does external technology acquisition determine export performance? Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms

Although technology profile has been one of the key determinants of firms’ export performance in the international business literature, most research has focused on only the role of internal technology efforts rather than the role of external technology. This study thus aims to extend our understanding of the determinants of export performance by examining the impact of the inter-organizational dimension of innovation strategy to export performance, which has been ignored in the prevailing “strategy tripod” perspective of exporting research. This study is based on a sample of 141 Chinese indigenous manufacturing firms that engaged in inward technology licensing between 2000 and 2003. The empirical results indicate that external technology acquisitions positively influence Chinese firms’ export performance. Moreover the exporting performance of using external technology varies depending on the their sources (domestic and foreign). The exporting firms that acquired technology from foreign countries outperformed those relied on domestically developed technology.     

中美贸易关系新形势下中国先进制造业升级路径研究

先进制造业是一国工业实力和竞争力的直接体现。目前,在中国先进制造业中,装备制造业竞争力明显提升、高技术制造业发展迅速、先进制造业出现集群式发展,但仍然存在创新能力较低、核心技术和零部件研发能力不强、先进制造业企业竞争力不强、缺乏有利的先进制造业发展环境等问题。应采取给予先进制造业发展更大的支持力度、坚持技术引进与自主创新融合、强化先进制造业的区域合作、引导企业提高自主创新能力等措施,推动中国先进制造业持续健康发展。     

基于因子分析模型的浙江省制造业技术创新能力评价

通过建立技术创新能力的评价指标体系,运用因子分析法对浙江省制造业行业的创新能力进行了综合评价,发现该行业技术创新能力普遍较低,同时发现技术创新投入产出能力和研究开发人员的研发能力是影响其技术创新总体能力的重要因素,并根据分析结果提出了相关对策建议。     

Technology competencies in competitive environment

Although prior studies suggest that technology competencies play a significant role in firm innovation and competitiveness, what and how technology competencies interacted with competitive environment affect firm innovation has not been fully understood. This paper fills this research gap through a questionnaire survey of 165 firms together with a number of interviews drawn from the Taiwan's information and communication technology (ICT) industry. The results suggest that capabilities of exploring or exploiting technological opportunities, core technology capability, and autonomy of R&D decisions are particularly important to firm innovation in a highly competitive environment, whereas over commitments to existing technologies may constrain a firm's innovation especially in such environment. Moreover, different types of competitive environment require different types of technological competencies to enhance firm innovativeness. This paper contributes to the existing theory by examining the joint effect of technology competency and competitive environment on a firm's innovation.     

Who Invests in the Least Developed Countries?

Abstract

Africa is a giant market with a population of Europe and Japan combined, and highly diversified with respect to culture, natural resources, economic development, and political regimes. Yet, the continent is largely ignored with respect to research on the multinational activities of U.S. firms. In this paper, we provide the first evidence regarding the operating characteristics of U.S. firms that operate in Africa. We find that firms with operations in Africa are larger, more diversified, and more profitable than a matched control sample of multinational firms. This paper also shows that technology firms, manufacturing firms, and mining firms dominate the rest of companies operating in Africa. Certain geographical regions in Africa also seem to attract more companies than others, with Southern Africa being the most preferred region, while Central Africa is the least preferred. Finally, when a multinational firm invests in a specific country in Africa, it tends to do so in several business sectors.     

人力资本匹配如何影响企业加成率:理论机制与经验证据

本文在拓展M-O模型的基础上,构建“人力资本-产业结构”匹配程度和匹配质量对企业加成率影响效应的理论框架,并利用中国城市统计数据和微观企业数据进行了经验研究。主要结论如下:城市人力资本发展滞后于产业结构调整,呈现“人力资本-产业结构”低质量耦合锁定趋势;“人力资本-产业结构”系统耦合度与企业加成率之间存在显著的“倒U型”关系,而系统协调度与企业加成率之间存在显著的“U型”关系。中间机制检验结果表明,耦合度产生的加成率效应主要通过“工资渠道”,而协调度会影响企业的“创新行为”。随着城市人力资本匹配质量提高,促进企业人力资本和研发创新协调投入会显著提升企业加成率。进一步分析发现,人力资本匹配与行业技能密集度相协调、与行业技术水平相匹配、与比较优势动态升级相结合、与企业自主升级行为区间互补,能让企业破除人力资本低质量耦合锁定而提高加成率。本文的结论对发挥人力资本质量外溢和技术进步效应推动制造业高质量发展具有重要现实意义。     

技术能力对企业采购能力的影响

本文主要阐述了企业技术能力的内涵及基于技术基础的核心能力观,并进一步研究了技术能力对于企业采购能力的影响。尽管企业采购理论和核心能力理论的角度并不相同,但企业技术能力及技术创新对资源稀缺型企业采购时获得持久竞争优势的重要性,使其成为共同关注的焦点。     

The impact of organizational pressures on environmental performance of firms

The role of various organizational pressures in influencing performance of firms has been an interesting research topic in a variety of fields and has received the attention of researchers working in the field of environmental strategy. Although there are previous studies that have looked at the influence of various pressures in influencing firms’ environmental strategies, our study provides a more holistic analysis considering a variety of such pressures in a single framework. We discuss a research study to analyze how pressures from internal and external stakeholders of a firm, economic pressures, environmental regulations, and pressures of environmental compliance have affected environmental performance of firms using data collected from manufacturing firms in the United Kingdom. We have found that internal stakeholders provide the greatest impact in shaping environmental performance of firms, closely followed by economic pressures, environmental regulations, and external stakeholders in that order. Fears of penalties due to environmental compliance have the least impact, although this pressure also has a positive and significant impact on environmental performance.     

Small firms and the merger mania

Empirical research has found an average or even superior performance of small firms. This seems to be at variance with the secular concentration process and the recurrent merger waves. This paper tries to integrate size and merger research. Higher profitability of small firms is explained by their incentive structure and shorter decision lags but also by lower wages and higher individual risk (premia). Their faster growth in the eighties was, in addition, fostered by diversification of demand, miniaturization of technology, and a need for flexibility under uncertainty. The merger wave on the other hand does not necessarily prove that large firms are superior. Managers and shareholders may be seduced by stockmarket optimism, a sizeable industry of banks, agents and lawyers have their own interests in mergers, mergers may be important in declining markets and for the acquisition of technology. On average, mergers do not improve efficiency, profits or internal growth. Small and large firms serve different purposes. Performance depends on the market, incentives and technology. The establishment, growth and closure of small firms as well as mergers are attempts to find the optimal organization for utility maximization in a world of severe uncertainty and diverse needs.