论广告责任的道德价值及结构序列

在广告活动中,广告发布方广告责任的道德含义是,行为主体出于内在的动机,虑及行为本身的直接后果和间接后果,并为其行为后果承担相应的社会义务的道德应该.文章指出,广告责任的内涵是丰富的而且有结构序列的,当处于选择的情形时,前位的责任优先后位的责任,由此,相比较于广告"要真实告知"这一道德准则,"不害人"这一底线责任是更加必须得到强调的原则.     

期待可能性的法哲学冲突分析及其在我国刑法体系中的定位

期待可能性近年来在我国的探讨尤为激烈,该理论理论有着深厚的哲学基础。例如作为其基础的规范责任论,以及意志自由问题都有研究的空间。恩格斯曾说：“如果不谈谈所谓自由意志、人的责任、必然和自由的关系等问题,就不能很好地讨论道德和法的问题。”笔者认为如果要将期待可能性理论纳入到我国刑法理论中来,就必须对其立论基础、含义,以及本土化的定位进行考察和分析,从而考量其是否有本土化的依据。     

利用他人实施商业诋毁行为的法律规制探讨

当前社会逐步意识到商业诋毁法律治理的缺失及完善的必要性。经营者利用网络水军、新闻媒体、专家、行业协会、公共机构等实施商业诋毁行为,应当依据共同侵权的理论,由侵权人共同承担《反不正当竞争法》第23条规定的损害赔偿责任。商业诋毁行为主体不应局限于存在"竞争关系"的经营者;在认定商业诋毁时,不应以"竞争关系"为前提要件,而只将其作为判断主观恶意及损害赔偿责任的考虑因素。     

论企业在市场营销中的社会责任

企业作为市场经济中的行为主体,既要通过一系列的营销活动,赢得利润最大化;又要承担社会责任,保护相关利益者的利益,但我国目前很多企业为了最大限度地攫取利润,在营销中存在着无视社会责任的行为,这不仅危害了消费者、社会、社区的利益,同时也危害了企业自身的长远利益,所以,企业在营销活动中要主动承担企业社会责任,以进一步提高市场营销水平,促进企业实现可持续发展。     

物流快递公司社会责任研究

物流快递公司社会责任包括法律责任、经济责任和道德责任。公司是以营利为目的的法人,其存在的根本目的是最大可能地创造社会财富,因此经济责任是第一位的社会责任;公司营利必须遵守国家法律,因此公司应当承担法律责任;公司承担道德责任在本质上是社会发展的需要,也是公司自身利益的需要,在根本上两者是一致的。     

试论康德伦理学的“自由”价值

自由与理性是构架康德哲学的根本性概念;自由是前提,同时也是落脚点;自由问题既显得必要,同时又把它作为先验范畴化为本体界亦具有不可知性;在以自由为前提下,康德认为理性的自然人必然能够在认识论领域为自然界立法,同时在道德领地一般理性存在者必定出于义务、遵循道德法则进而自我立法。康德伦理学以"自由意志"为前提,意在建立适于一切人类理性的、普遍有效的道德法则,同时对自由的问题保留,使得"上帝存有"与灵魂不朽"理想得以成立,为"至善"理念找到了栖息之地。     

网络媒体的社会责任及政策建议

编者按：随着信息技术的发展和网络的普及,网络媒体已经成为社会生活的重要组成部分。作为一种公共传播媒介,网络媒体在维持自身的发展同时,应履行更加广泛的社会责任。然而网络媒体中的虚假信息、低俗内容等社会责任缺失现象普遍存在。网络媒体应通过透明的和合乎道德的行为,为其决策和活动对社会和环境的影响而承担的责任;还应充分尊重和考虑利益相关方的利益和回应,使其能更好地履行社会责任。     

企业承担社会责任的法经济学分析

企业社会责任主要包括法律责任和道德责任。通过成本——收益的分析方法可知公司承担社会责任与其追求利润最大化的目标并不矛盾。根据公司承担社会责任的成本收益公式L相似文献   

企业的性质及其社会责任管理

随着市场经济的发展,企业作为社会行为主体,其目标不应该只是追求利润的最大化,其在享有社会权利的同时应该承担自己的多元社会责任。本文尝试从企业社会属性的角度来研究企业在现代市场经济应该承担社会责任的依据,同时对于企业如何进行社会责任管理进行探讨。     

社会责任:企业永续经营的基石

本文认为,企业的社会责任是企业对社会符合道德的行为,主要包括对消费者的责任,对社会的利益和发展的责任,对自然环境及社会生态平衡的责任,对企业员工的责任。企业要长远发展,必须要有核心价值观,必须讲道德,必须承担社会责任。承担社会责任不仅有利于社会大众,更有利于企业自身,它可以提升企业的社会形象和声誉,提高企业经营效益,建立员工和顾客持续稳固的忠诚,从而使企业获得长期繁荣和持续发展。     

Corporate Rights to Free Speech?

Although the courts have ruled that companies are legal persons, they have not yet made clear the extent to which political free speech for corporations is limited by the strictures legitimately placed upon corporate commercial speech. I explore the question of whether or not companies can properly be said to have the right to civil free speech or whether corporate speech is always de facto commercial speech not subject to the same sorts of legal protections as is the right to civil free speech. In the absence of clearly defined legal precedent, I emphasize moral reasons for determining the appropriate limits of corporate civil free speech. Appealing to arguments typically used to justify individual rights to civil free speech, I examine the extent to which this sort of justification may or may not be legitimately extended to corporations. I conclude that corporate rights to civil free speech must be restricted because granting rights of free speech to institutions may, in practice, undermine the moral rationale and practical feasibility of guaranteeing rights of civil free speech to individuals. Furthermore, I argue that granting corporations full rights to civil free speech will undercut attempts to develop good moral character in corporate institutions by undermining the efforts of watchdog organizations.     

The responsible shareholder: a case study

Shareholders are sometimes considered to be, in moral terms, the owners of a company, they are after all the carriers of the residual liabilities and bear a higher proportion of the financial risk. However, in company law, the shareholders' responsibility is limited, and in financial terms shareholders are only liable up to the fully paid value of the share certificate. Moreover, when the shares are sold, the responsibility and risk are transferred completely to the new bearer of the shares. Whether this gap in moral and legal perceptions can be judged to be satisfactory in business ethics terms is a moot point and will be partly explored in this case study which seeks to analyse the shareholder's responsibility towards a firm in which they own shares. The case study company chosen as a vehicle to explore these issues is that of Turner & Newall; a company that subjected its employees, communities and customers to a major health hazard – asbestosis. This paper will use the Turner & Newall archive materials to illustrate the moral hazards that can arise for shareholders. In particular it will examine the ethical responsibilities of shareholders towards those stakeholders who were exposed to the dangers of asbestos. This case is a significant test of the veracity of the legal system of company control, and exposes the ineffectiveness of that system in accountability terms. The case study also deals with specific issues that arose in the asbestos crisis, as well as with more general issues in our present system of corporate governance and shareholder responsibilities.     

Expanding Workers’ ‘Moral Space’: A Liberal Critique of Corporate Capitalism

This paper assesses employees’ moral agency within corporate capitalism from a politically liberal standpoint. While political liberalism has spelt out its key institutional implications at state level, it has neglected moral agency at work, assuming that a rights-based state that secures freedom of contract, free choice of occupation and a free labour market within a fair context would protect it sufficiently. Yet two features of corporate capitalism constrain employees’ moral agency: the relation of authority that forms part of the work contract and organisations’ fragmented decision-making processes. Both seem at odds with the liberal ideal of allowing people to live by their own conception of the good. Consequently, this paper examines whether political liberalism should recommend greater safeguards for protecting workers’ moral agency. It proposes a criterion for assessing corporate capitalism: the ‘moral space’ defined as the socially shaped opportunities for action that can be enacted or endorsed from a comprehensive perspective. It argues that liberals should favour arrangements that widen workers’ moral space and suggests institutional designs that may achieve this while remaining within liberal boundaries.     

SA8000对企业的影响和对策

企业社会责任的提出是社会生产和历史发展的必然产物,企业社会标准———SA8000是企业参与国际市场竞争的入场证,对我国企业的生存和发展有很大影响,必须高度重视和积极应对。企业应是一个负有社会责任的经济主体,企业既要讲求经济效益,又要履行道德义务,承担社会责任,在提高产品和服务质量的同时,努力树立企业良好的社会形象。     

The Missing Dynamic: Corporations, Individuals and Contracts

In this article we discuss whether it pays to invest ethically. Our aim is to examine corporate social responsibility from philosophical, moral and practical points of views. We focus on two main issues related to ethical investments. Firstly we discuss the moral dilemma of how capitalism has changed its shape in today’s world and from ‘blaming the business’ there is a general attempt to use the markets to promote ethics values and corporate social responsibility. Secondly, we analyze the growth of ethical investment funds in the UK today, and their performance, and highlight some of the institutional investors involved in the management of ethical funds. We discuss whether ethical investments really succeed in reducing the conflict between profit-making and social responsibility as they promise or whether they use commercial rhetoric and market mechanism to merely sell us our own perceived values back. We conclude that the paper has a key contribution in setting the scene for future research in an area that is evolving and of fundamental importance to companies, investors and various stakeholder groups.     

试论我国目前经济状态下的雇主责任

雇主责任也称替代责任,替代责任是一种无过错责任,雇员只要在雇用范围内实施了侵权行为,雇主即要对受害人承担赔偿责任,不问雇主是否有过错。大陆法中的雇主责任,有的国家采用过错推定责任,有的国家采用无过错责任。无过错责任原则合乎世界民法之潮流,应当为我国未来民法典所借鉴。     

经济运行与道德判断和谐发展研究

经济研究不仅不应该排斥价值判断,而且经济学家的责任就在于认真探索社会的价值准则。把人类的一切经济行为置放于理性的道德语境中,进行宏观关照与微观分析,我们会清楚地发现,经济行为其实就是一种道德行为,理性的经济发展会有助于社会道德水平的提升。     

企业社会责任与和谐劳动关系构建

结合以SA8000标准为代表的企业社会责任运动,本文将企业的成本收益纳入分析框架,通过动态最优化博弈模型考察SA8000是否有利于改善我国转型期较紧张的企业劳动关系。研究表明,在其他条件不变的情况下,我国企业缺乏改善劳动关系的动力;SA8000的影响力、国外企业的劳动关系投入等与改善劳动关系呈正相关,而通过SA8000认证的费用与其负相关;企业利润与改善劳动关系之间并非绝对的不相容,在保证企业利润的前提下,SA8000有利于改善我国企业劳动关系。     

Business Ethics as Field of Teaching,Training and Research in Sub-Saharan Africa

The notion of “responsibility” can be understood in a number of different ways, namely as being accountable for one’s actions, as a personal trait, or as a task or duty that results from one’s role. In this article we will challenge the assumptions that underpin each of these employments of the word “responsibility” and seek to redefine the concept as such. The main thrust of the argument is that we need to critically interrogate the idea of “identity” and deliberate decision-making that inform the use of all three of these notions of “responsibility”. By drawing on selected concepts emanating from the oeuvre of Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, our understanding of agency moves away from “identity” towards “multiplicity”. In fact, it will be argued that our sense of “agency” is a side-product of our own desiring-production as it operates in and through our interactions with other human beings and organizational structures. The article therefore contends that “responsible management” requires ongoing re-articulations of moral responsiveness.